My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2018 12 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2018 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2018 12 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:13 PM
Creation date
1/16/2019 2:11:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2018 12 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 21, 2016 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />Stuart states that he thought small changes to the percent of lot coverage on small lots <br />could be approved administratively. <br />Ritchie explains that the lot exceeded the 8,000 square foot minimum, so it has to come <br />before the Board. <br />Campbell asks why the existing deck was failing. <br />Ritchie states that the homeowner could address that question. <br />Campbell asks for the lot sizes of neighboring properties. <br />Ritchie provides the averages for the neighborhood, summarizing that the lots to the <br />north and south were mostly the same size and that the neighborhood had been platted <br />with even property divisions. <br />DeJong asks if Powerline Trail was to the east of the property. <br />Ritchie confirms that it is. <br />Ewy asks if the application could be approved administratively if the lot were 200 square <br />feet smaller. <br />Ritchie confirms. <br />Stuart references the slideshow, stating that the lots to the west were quite a bit bigger <br />than the applicant's property. <br />Levinson replies that the two above it and the one below it had more coverage than the <br />application in question. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Applicant: Bradley Latham <br />Latham explains that when he and his wife bought the house, they were told that the <br />deck would need to be replaced. Boards are crumbling and there are loose boards. <br />They have a five -year -old daughter and want to replace the existing deck for safety <br />reasons. The Lathams are expanding the deck to accommodate a preexisting bay <br />window that cuts into the deck space. They are also proposing to move the deck stairs <br />from the edge to the side of the deck, meaning that it will not extend as far as it does <br />now. Latham also mentions that they want to provide a nice aesthetic facing Powerline <br />Trail, as well. <br />Board Questions of Applicant: <br />Campbell asks if the applicant constructed the deck. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.