Laserfiche WebLink
the Licensee's license is appropriate." Chairman Jeffers then outlined the order of the hearing. <br />Jeffers asked that the attorney for the City and Licensee please identify themselves and state whether they <br />were ready to proceed. <br /> <br />Steve Barnett, attorney representing the City of Louisville, stated that he is ready to proceed and that he <br />was not aware of any preliminary matters that the City will present to the Authority. <br /> <br />Michael Rennich, attorney representing L&G Liquors, the licensee, stated that he was prepared to go <br />forward. He stated that he does not have any preliminary matter to present to the Authority. <br /> <br />Chairperson Jefferson made a part of the record of the hearing the Show Cause Order, including exhibits, <br />and the other materials contained in the Authority packets, and asked if the attorneys whether they had <br />opening statements to make. <br /> <br />Attorney Barnett read the provisions of the Statutes, which the licensee was alleged to have violated. He <br />cited C.R.S., Section 12-47-901 (1) (a), which provides that it is unlawful for any person to sell, serve, <br />give away, dispose of, exchange, or deliver or permit the sale, serving, giving, or procuring of alcoholic <br />beverages to or for any person under the age of twenty-one years. The second section which is alleged to <br />have been violated is C.R.S., Section 12-47-901 (5) (a) (1), which provides that it is unlawful for any <br />person licensed to sell alcoholic beverages at retail to sell an alcoholic beverage to any person under the <br />age of twenty-one years. The last provision that the licensee has alleged to have violated is Louisville <br />Municipal Code Section 9.22.060, which provides that it is unlawful for any person to sell, serve, give <br />away, dispose of, exchange or deliver, or permit the sale, serving, giving away or procuring of, any malt, <br />vinous or spirituous liquor to or for any person under the age of twenty-one years. He stated that section <br />was essentially a repeat of the first Statute that has allegedly been violated. <br /> <br />Attorney Barnett stated that the City would call one witness, Officer Bruce Moua, former police officer <br />for the City of Louisville. Officer Moua's police report was part of the record, and was contained in the <br />Show Cause Order. <br /> <br />Attorney Rennich: "The evidence will show that if there was a sale to someone, who was not yet twenty- <br />one, that it was a result of a fraudulent I.D. He noted that Mr. Galvin makes photocopies of drivers' <br />lilcenses of those individuals, who are indeed twenty-one, but maybe twenty-one and six months. Anyone <br />that is barely twenty-one, Mr. Galvin copies their driver's license. The evidence will also show that the <br />individual, who is alleged to have purchased the alcoholic beverages from Mr. Galvin's liquor store, <br />produced, following his stop and arrest, a Utah driver's license. On that driver's license the birth date is <br />September 17, 1978, 9/17/78. This guy came in that night and the evidence will show Mr. Galvin <br />remembers it in detail. The copy of the driver's license that he has, and has given me, and I will use as an <br />exhibit, is also a Utah driver's license. It has a picture of the individual, and it is too bad he ignored his <br />subpoena tonight. You would have seen it's the same guy, or closely resembles that guy. But not only <br />the physical appearance the same, the Utah driver's license is the same, but the birthday on the driver's <br />license copied, is exactly one month difference than what was produced to the officer who made the <br />arrest. Section 12-47-901 (5) (a) (I) says in pertinent part, that a person who in fact is not twenty-one <br />years of age, exhibits a fraudulent proof of age, and actually lying on such fraudulent proof of age, shall <br />not constitute grounds for the revocation or the suspension of any license issued under Article 46, for <br />Title 12. As far as the I.D., it is a complete defense, and we will show the Authority that is what <br />happened." <br /> <br /> <br />