My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990 BOA Case Files
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
1974-1998 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
1990 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
1990 BOA Case Files
>
1990 BOA Case Files
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2024 11:23:41 AM
Creation date
1/20/2021 3:30:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Smith stated if the applicant would wan to build something <br />they would have to come back to the variance board for approva:J <br />and this should be flagged at the time of building permit. <br />Franklin stated that a copy of the paper work would be included <br />in the building permit file for reference. <br />Sears asked if handrails would be put in. <br />Hartronft stated no. We are only talking about 18 inches. <br />Sears asked how big the redwood deck is? <br />Hartronft stated it is about 10 feet out and 8 feet over. About <br />150 square feet. <br />Sears asked when there is a road to the side of the a lot what is <br />the setback? <br />Wood stated the sideyard setback to the street is 30 feet from <br />the public right of way, but this is a private one. <br />Sears asked if this was replatted? Was it a replat of the <br />original Continental View. <br />Hartronft stated this was never part of Continental View. This <br />was a new annexation and subdivision not a replat. <br />Smith moved to grant the variance for the backyard setback to <br />fifteen feet from the 25 foot requirement for uncovered redwood <br />deck and to include no more than the proposed envelope 150 square <br />feet+, and the height to be no more than 18 inches not including <br />the bench that is proposed, seconded by Fyne. By Roll Call Vote <br />motion passed 5-0. <br />Sears stated he had a concern with the fact that no alternation <br />was made to the house for the roof and the deck. I do have a <br />problem with the lot and the size of the house that is on it, <br />doesn't go along with rest of the neighborhood. My major <br />objection is that this just doesn't fit in. <br />Smith moved to approve the variance for an increase of .59% on <br />the lot coverage which will include the rear deck and the covered <br />steps, seconded by Fyne. <br />Smith stated that the lot coverage is already there with the wall <br />being there, so the addition of a roof is just going to be a <br />hardship for the owner. If the neighbors are willing to live <br />with the additional cover, by not passing this we are only hurt- <br />ing the owners. <br />Sears felt that the board should have looked at this issue sooner <br />than they have. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.