My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2009 02 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2009 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2009 02 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:18 AM
Creation date
5/7/2009 11:26:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2009 02 12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />FEBRUARY 12, 2009 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />Michael Menaker, 1827 W. Chokecherry Dr. stated there are similar poles <br />already located in Louisville. <br /> <br />Staff and Applicant Summarv and Recommendation: <br />No additional comments. <br /> <br />Public Hearinq Closed Commission Comments: <br />Lipton closed the public hearing and requested board discussion. <br /> <br />Sheets stated her support for the proposal. <br /> <br />Tengler stated the site should be considered temporary and have the applicant <br />come back when the buildings are completed. <br /> <br />Pritchard stated that he believes ConocoPhillips does not want the cell tower on <br />the property. He stated the site should only be available to Sprint Nextel and not <br />made available to other cell companies. <br /> <br />Lipton stated he would like to have additional information as to why this location <br />is the best. <br /> <br />Loo stated that one more pole on the site will not make an impact on the <br />aesthetics and good cell service transmission is a public benefit. <br /> <br />Sheets agreed with Loo and stated an SRU can be brought back to the board at <br />another time if the board felt it was necessary. <br /> <br />Russell agreed with Loo. <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />Tengler moved and Pritchard seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 02, <br />Series 2009, a SRU request to allow for the placement of an Alternative Tower <br />Structure (A TS) CMRS facility on property owned by ConocoPhillips. <br /> <br />Lipton offered a friendly amendment to add the words "temporary placement" in <br />the title. <br /> <br />Amendment was accepted by Tengler and Pritchard. <br /> <br />Name Vote <br />Jeff Lipton No <br />Chris Pritchard Yes <br />Susan S. Loo Yes <br />Gail Hartman excused <br />Monica Sheets Yes <br />Cary Tengler Yes <br />Scott Russell Yes <br />Motion passed: 5 to 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.