My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2008 03 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2008 Planning Commission Agendas and Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2008 03 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:18 AM
Creation date
5/7/2009 11:32:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2008 03 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 13, 2008 <br />Page 8 of 11 <br /> <br />Pritchard, Russell and Tengler had questions about the current location and the business practices <br />ofUdi's. <br /> <br />Moore stated the current site at tih and Broadway has approximately 1,300 SF, has been a very <br />successful business thus the reason for the expansion to Louisville. They do a considerable <br />amount of catering services and the bakery is strictly wholesale. <br /> <br />Stat! and Applicant Summarv and Recommendation: <br />No additional comments. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Closed Commission Comments: <br />Pritchard stated his support of the project and expressed concern with the additional signage <br />request. <br /> <br />Tengler stated his support of the project and his concern with the signage request. <br /> <br />Lipton stated his support of: the project and the additional wall sign request. He stated he does <br />not support the Administrative Review of Expansion. <br /> <br />Russell expressed his concern with the signage request and the possible expansion without public <br />reVIew. <br /> <br />Hartman stated her support of the project and suggested the Commission add a discussion at <br />another meeting regarding how to treat future expansion of a project. <br /> <br />Loo stated her support of the project and suggested the Commission consider a compromise on <br />the signage. <br /> <br />Pritchard stated his agreement with Lipton, suggesting the removal of Condition #2 (If the <br />applicant expands the extent of the SRU, up to 4,000 SF total, they shall be permitted to do so <br />through Administrative Approval). He also suggested changing Condition #1 to state 2 wall signs <br />with a maximum of30 SF each. <br /> <br />Lipton moved and Tengler seconded a motion to approve Resolution No.4, Series 2008 with the <br />following changes to the conditions: remove Condition #2, change the wording of Condition #1 <br />to read as "One (1) 30 SF wall sign, per building (Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 4, Business Center at <br />CTC, Replat F)." <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: <br /> <br />Name Vote <br />Jeff Lipton Yes <br />Chris Pritchard Yes <br />Susan S. Loo Yes <br />Gail Hartman Yes <br />Monica Sheets Excused <br />Cary Tengler Yes <br />Scott Russell Yes <br />Motion passed: 6 to 0 <br /> <br />Approval of Meeting Minutes and Summary: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.