My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1997 05 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1997 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1997 05 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:42 PM
Creation date
4/7/2004 10:28:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
5/20/1997
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1997 05 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Davidson called for the applicant's presentation. <br /> <br />Erik Hartronft, Hartronft Associates, 1021 South Boulder Road, Louisville, Colorado, reviewed the <br />project. He pointed out that the building will have an elevator for ADA accessibility and the building <br />will be brought up to current building and fire code. Sprinklers will be added to the building. A steel <br />framed canvas awning will be on the front of the building. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council comments. <br /> <br />Mayer was concerned that the signage be done well and that only three parking spaces would be <br />added for 4,500 s.f. of office space. The parking impact on the neighborhood would be tremendous. <br /> <br />Lathrop liked the project. <br /> <br />Keany wanted a drawing of the building from the across the street to see what the building would <br />look like. <br /> <br />Sisk wanted to know the types of retail/office mixture they were proposing. <br /> <br />Hartronft stated that they were going to encouraging retail use on the first floor and office upstairs. <br />They hope to start occupancy this fall. <br /> <br />Sisk wanted the increased parking need resolved. <br /> <br />Hartonfi felt the parking issues are a downtown-wide problem rather than a site specific problem. <br /> <br />Howard thought the outside lighting appeared to be more intensive than what currently exists on site. <br />He wanted to know the signage plans and that the doors were in conformance with safety codes in <br />terms of ingress/egress. He wanted to know the impact on on-street parking and he wondered if <br />Louisville might have to go to head-in parking. He did like the project. <br /> <br />Levihn liked the project, particularly the retail on the first floor. He was concerned about the parking. <br />He did consider the parking problem downtown a City problem, not necessarily the owners of the <br />businesses. <br /> <br />Davidson liked the project. As far as the parking, he pointed out that the parking issue came up for <br />the expansion further down Main Street and Council added language about a parking district. He <br />suggested the same language be added about the financial obligation. <br /> <br />Sisk moved that Council move this on to the Planning Commission, seconded by Howard. All in <br />favor. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.