Laserfiche WebLink
Sustainability Advisory Board Agenda <br />November 17 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Mark: reported that the traditional venue for the Green Business breakfast may <br />be changed. <br />Todd: reported that there are nine applicants for the upcoming open position on <br />LSAB, indicating that LSAB is a desirable board. Todd also previewed our <br />upcoming discussion of our 2022 work plan. He would like us to sharply focus <br />our work plan so that we make the best use of our limited time. He would also <br />like us to form subcommittees to further our progress. He welcomes any <br />feedback on this new format. <br />7. 6:55 PM City Staff Update (Q&A) <br />Todd asked about current subscriptions to the sustainability newsletter. Todd <br />also asked about stacking of sustainability incentives for commercial and <br />industrial businesses from Xcel Energy and from the City. Katie said that the City <br />is studying Westminster's current program and considering extensions around <br />equity. Todd also asked about how money would likely be allocated. Katie said <br />that the City would likely budget a certain amount, which would then be <br />disbursed on a first -come, first -serve basis with a maximum allocation. Todd also <br />asked about making the incentive stacking program part of a larger program or <br />set of programs. Katie said that her report to City Council the night before <br />showcased programs that could be implemented immediately; an incentive <br />stacking program is backed by less data than the programs mentioned in her <br />presentation. <br />8. 7:00 PM Discussion Item: Climate Action Programming Matrix <br />Led by Katie Baum, Sustainability Coordinator <br />Todd noted that he is unsure how well the content of the climate action matrix <br />was communicated to City Council as Katie's presentation had lots of varied <br />information bound up with the discussion of a climate action tax; Katie tended to <br />agree. Todd then raised Mayor Stolzmann's question about the quantification of <br />net metering (in the context of private solar installations). Tiffany raised the <br />related question of how we manage messaging to City Council in the event that <br />the City transitions completely to renewable energy (even if some of this usage <br />comes from RECs). Katie suggested that we focus on the benefits of <br />sustainability projects beyond a complete transition to renewable energy. Katie <br />noted that she is still not sure what City Council is asking of City staff and that <br />City staff could use this direction. Dan asked if any of the LSAB members at the <br />City Council meeting the night before had impressions on this issue. Todd <br />thought that Katie's presentation of programming was perhaps at too high, too <br />coarse a level, while Katie thought that her presentation was quite specific. <br />Tiffany asked about making the costs clearer; Katie noted the initial funding <br />requests in her presentation. Tiffany thought that we should clearly differentiate <br />between a climate action tax and more general budget requests. Deb Fahey <br />volunteered that a chart showing very specifically what the City could do (and <br />