Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11/3/83 <br /> <br />Page -16- <br /> <br />Meier didn't feel that it was fair to hold <br />this 175 permit figure to both McStain and <br />Homart7 and have them battle out whom will <br />get what. Didn't agree with this. <br /> <br />Councilman Leary <br /> <br />Inquired of Mayor Meier what he meant by <br />fairness and what role fairness has as opposed <br />to the whole concept and reason we are con- <br />cerned about this, which is how much resi- <br />dential property can we build without accom- <br />panying it with commercial and office de- <br />velopment: . <br />Meier stated that the 175 permit figure was <br />set down a long time ago with a totally <br />different concept, and did not feel this <br />meant the maximum number of units that they <br />could build. Seemed to him that it was an <br />arbritary number that was placed in there <br />because nobody was dealing with the housing <br />at that point. Reiterated that he didn't <br />think it was fair to deal with a number that <br />was developed over a different set of criteria. <br />Leary disagreed stating there are two different <br />developers - one come in to build residential <br />and feels that he was guaranteed 119 permits, <br />another who came in to build commercial and <br />has, he assumed - 50 permits. The one that is <br />building the commercial has changed his plans <br />and isn't totally dealing with their end of <br />the deal, so they want more residential. <br />He felt that Mayor Meier was saying that to be <br />fair give them additional permits. <br /> <br />Councilman Ferrera <br /> <br />Inquired where the 140 permit figure was in <br />the agreement. <br />Rautenstraus advised that the figure was not <br />in the agreement. If council wished to <br />specify a number of units per year, it would <br />need to be an addition to the agreement. <br />The agreement states the specific yearly <br />allocation of the permits would be setforth <br />in the individual subdivision agreements. <br />Stated that council was not required to place <br />a figure in the master plan situation. <br /> <br />MC STAIN MASTER PLAN <br />APPROVAL <br /> <br />Councilman Leary moved, Councilman Ferrera <br />seconded that. the amendment to the Centennial <br />Valley annnexation agreement be approved <br />Question called for. All in favor. Motion <br />carried unanimously 5-0. <br />