My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1983 04 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1983 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1983 04 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:21 PM
Creation date
7/7/2009 4:28:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/19/1983
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1983 04 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4/19/83 <br /> <br />Page -4- <br /> <br />Results of Survey <br /> <br />decided to take an informal, objective sur- <br />vey of the residents in Ward III. On April <br />12th they presented the results of the sur- <br />vey to the Planning Commission, to which she <br />received recognition from only 3 Planning <br />Commission members. Afterwards she spoke <br />with a councilm€~mber to get his comment on <br />the results from Ward III. He said that a <br />councilman not only represents his Ward but <br />what is in the best interest of the entire <br />City. Keeping this statement in mind, they <br />decided to survey Wards I and II; confident <br />that the results would be the same, and to <br />test the water should a referendum become <br />necessary. They tried to get a cross-section <br />of neighborhoods that included Mesa Point, <br />Hillsborough North, Downtown, Chadsford, <br />Dutch Creek, Windmill Pointe, and the estab- <br />lished area contiguous to the Centennial <br />Valley subdivision, commonly referred to as <br />old town. It wa.s emphasized that they were <br />not against anne:xation of additional land <br />and additional n~w homes~ but for the City <br />of Louisville to delay major annexations <br />until major issues and objectives have been <br />addressed. They feel Louisville cannot af- <br />ford to service its residents at a pace which <br />we are growing now. Mr. Leon Wurl said, him- <br />self, that the residential growth is bring- <br />ing a lot of money into the City to provide <br />established areas with such benefits as street <br />pavement overlays and new water lines. With <br />this type of policy the only way for Louisville <br />to stay ahead is to continue more and more <br />growth. What is going to happen to all the <br />new areas when they become the established <br />areas and the growth has reached Louisville's <br />boundaries. <br />Ms. Johnson presented councilmembers a copy <br />of the survey taken by 5 people in a 3 hour <br />time period on Sunday, April 10th and April <br />17th. The results of the survey indicated <br />of 196 people 88.8% were in support of a <br />proposed slow-down policy, 3.6% were opposed, <br />and 7.6% had no comment. <br />Ms. Johnson felt this survey should demonstrate <br />to the councilmembers and members of Planning <br />Commission that their constituents are in <br />support of the proposed slow-down policy and <br />at this time the Warembourg annexation is <br />not in the best interest of Louisville citizens. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.