My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1983 01 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1983 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1983 01 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:20 PM
Creation date
7/7/2009 4:40:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
1/18/1983
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1983 01 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilmen Cussen and Ferrera <br /> <br />Councilman Cummings <br /> <br />Councilman Fauson <br /> <br />Mayor Meier <br /> <br />1/18/83 <br /> <br />Page -24- <br /> <br />Mr. Caranci stated he had spent 3 years <br />working on the project, and if he-had to r.evise <br />it again would be too costly; as well as <br />repeating the process would be too time con- <br />suming. <br /> <br />Commented they concurred with Councilman Leary <br />that Mr. Caranci should go back to the Plan- <br />ning Commission. <br /> <br />Commented that Director Rupp had mentioned <br />concerns of our Engineering Dept. and Mr. <br />Caranci's engineer that needed to be resolved, <br />were these general details that would go be- <br />fore the Planning Commission? <br />Director Rupp stated they are usually those <br />kinds of things that are worked out at the <br />staff level, then when they appear before <br />Planning Commission and Council is the work- <br />ings of what has been resolved by the staff. <br />Rupp stated that he did not expect this item <br />to be on the agenda this evening. <br /> <br />Commented that he felt that if the problems <br />have been addressed and council did receive <br />a recommendation to deny this from the Plan- <br />ning Commission, and Mr. Caranci stated these <br />concerns have been corrected, he too felt <br />the project should go back to the Planning <br />Commission. Asked Mr. Caranci if it was <br />the time element that concerned him? <br />Mr. Caranci stated that from the very begin- <br />ing, the Planning Commission felt that the <br />entire project should be revised. They said <br />it was a good presentation; it blends with <br />the contour of the hillside; but there were <br />so many discrepancies. For instance the <br />entrance-way should be in another location; <br />everyone seemed to have a different concept <br />of what should be done. Felt that if an <br />additional $30,000 - $40,000 is spent on <br />the project in engineering design the pro- <br />ject would not be any more workable. <br /> <br />Remarked except for the possibility of the <br />access point to the property being addressed; <br />other concerns were expressed about the <br />grading of one street and the lots there, <br />Director Rupp stated that that had been <br />taken care of and they would drain to the <br />street; the retaining walls had been elimin- <br />ated, and if the access point could be worked <br />out with the Fire Dept. then the concern re- <br />lative to the access is being addressed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.