My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1982 06 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1982 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1982 06 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:19 PM
Creation date
7/8/2009 4:28:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/15/1982
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1982 06 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Page -3- <br />what our action is going to be a little more.,. or maybe it wouldn't. <br />It appears that the issues in the subdivision thing with the exception <br />of attachment A and some of the concerns in terms of how we are going <br />to work out the agreements and a separate agreement, are things that the <br />public needsto be aware of. It seems that if they have the knowledge <br />of what we are going to do, their comments might be more pointed or more <br />directed at our action. <br />Meier - That would probably be more appropriate; hopefully by now, with <br />the Planning Commission process having gone thru, they hopefully know <br />what the subdivision plat is about, but if Curt would go ahead and ex- <br />plain that and what the action is that the Council is taking tonight, I <br />would appreciate it. Then we will start with you, Mr. MaImer. <br />Curt:As.atuthe Planning Commission's meeting, tonight's resolution only <br />ieals with the subdivision plat - which is really what one of the docu- <br />ments - the document which is up on the wall there; and there are cer- <br />tain technical requirements which must be met. However the plat itself, <br />and the subdivision does not deal specifically with the use of the property. <br />That is more of a zoning question. <br />Meier: And I think also just add that along with the resolution adopted <br />by the Planning Commission, I think that you have to deal with those 3 <br />or try to deal with those 3 items - the conditions. About the joint <br />access, the road improvements - the date of that and that Neodata has <br />worked with the neighbors. <br />Curt: As part of the process, of course, we have prepared the sub- <br />division agreement which is standard and which includes discussions relative <br />to the public improvements which are required - somewhat the timing of " <br />the improvements, the sureties required with respect to the improvements <br />are the basic items required by the City, of a developer, and in the agree- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).