City Council Minutes 1982 06 15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CONCERNED CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK ON NEODATA ISSUE 6/15/82 Page -8- Those subject matters that had been discussed dealt with the landscaping plan, phase II improvements to South Boulder Road, and dedi- cation of open space, etc. as outlined in the subdivision agreement. The recommendation of the Planning Commission was for approval with the following conditions: First that there be joint access with Neodata and the LDS Church property which is to the east, but divided by a 75 ft. Public Service piece of property.. This is to be explored as fully as possible and implemented in the subdivision agreement if joint access could be worked out. The second aspect was they would like to high- light the road improvements which are to occur on or before June 15, 1983. The last point was that City Council review the good faith effort Neodata has made with the neigh- borhood associations relating to landscaping prior to approval. The plat meets all the technical requirements of the subdivision ordinances and recommendation is for approval. Mr. Ken Tanaguchi, Architect for the project was present to answer any questions. Mayor Meier advised that 4 people had signed up to speak on this issue and requested they limit their comments to 4-5 minutes. He also requested that Attorney Rautenstraus advise the audience of what action was being taken by the Council this evening. Attorney Rautenstraus advised that as at the Planning Commission meeting, the resolution only dealt with the subdivision plat - zoning was a separate issue. A subdivision agreement had been prepared as part of the process, dealing with public improvements, the timing of those improvements, sureties required by the City of a developer. The subdivision is with the current property owner - B.S.C.S. Neodata as the applicant has provided a separate agreement to the City relative to landscaping improvements in the amount of $160,000.00, and will post a performance bond in this amount within 10 days of the agreement, which will continue in effect after building permits are issued. If, however, no building permits are issued with- in one year then they will be able to with- draw the performance bond.