My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1982 05 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1982 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1982 05 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:19 PM
Creation date
7/9/2009 2:51:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
5/4/1982
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1982 05 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />5/4/82 <br /> <br />Page .,..12.,.. <br /> <br />further stated even though the increase <br />would be 2 years away, perhaps in a year <br />he could support it, if the City is in a <br />better financial conditi6n, but at this <br />time felt it was premature. <br /> <br />Councilman Cummings <br /> <br />Concurred with Councilman Leary and didn't <br />feel the need had been established. He <br />felt it ~ras wrong. Other rates were being <br />increased with justification, and would vote <br />against the ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilman Fauson <br /> <br />Commented he wished to speak to Councilman <br />Leary's statement that Council would be <br />raising their salaries. He felt the ordinance <br />would not increase the present Council's <br />salary but that of the oncoming Council. <br /> <br />Responded he was aware of this, but still <br />felt unl€~ss the financial condition improves <br />Council should wait until September of the <br />year before the next election, if affordable <br />at that time, Council can do it. <br /> <br />Councilman Leary <br /> <br />Mayor Meier <br /> <br />Commented the only reason he asked this <br />ordinance be prepared, not to see that the <br />next Council received a salary increase, <br />but to r€~mind members that this was a <br />typographical error in an ordinance. The <br />last time it was prepared and present <br />councilmembers were supposed to be receiving <br />this increase when they assumed office. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />MOTION DEFEATED TO PUBLISH <br />ORDINANCE #758 <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />YES: Fauson, Morris <br />NO: Leary, Ferrera, Meier, Cussen, <br />Cummings <br />Motion defeated 5-2. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE #759 - WATER AND <br />WASTEWATER TAP FEES <br /> <br />Mayor and Councilmembers had a copy of the <br />ordinance before them. <br />Attorney Rautenstraus read the ordinance by <br />title only on first reading and the request <br />was for publication. <br /> <br />Commented the last time a tap fee increase <br />ordinance was presented, it contained an <br />emergency clause, would it be wise to do this? <br />Rautenstraus replied it is not normally done <br />unless it .is necessary. <br /> <br />Mayor Meier <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.