My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1982 04 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1982 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1982 04 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:19 PM
Creation date
7/9/2009 2:57:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/20/1982
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1982 04 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4/20/82 <br /> <br />Page -14- <br /> <br />Question called for, All in favor. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE <br />INCREASE <br /> <br />Administrator Wurl advised the data for <br />this recommendation was also discussed with <br />Council at a study session. Councilmembers <br />had a copy of the proposals. The request <br />was for Council's authorization to prepare <br />an ordinance on the water and wastewater <br />increases based on Plan C-2. <br />He stated on the water assessment all the <br />figures Council had requested were not com- <br />plete; but the water rights acquisition had <br />been reviewed - the owners of the rights had <br />been contacted and agreed to grant time <br />extension from 6 months to a year. The <br />total calculated for purchase of the water <br />rights at this time is $347,340.00. He <br />expected to have the figures on the filter <br />plant improvements ready for the study <br />session of April 27, 1982. <br /> <br />~ouncilman Ferrera <br /> <br />InqHired if the ordinance could be delayed <br />until the assessment fee is determined, as <br />he felt the residents would perceive this <br />as 2 increases because it is all on one billing. <br /> <br />Administrator Wurl commented this could be <br />done after the April 27th study session when <br />Council could indicate their preference. <br /> <br />Mayor Heier <br /> <br />Commented he felt two ordinances would better <br />explain the reason for the increases, the <br />assessment charge being for the water right <br />acquisition. <br /> <br />Administrator Wurl advised from a practical <br />point of view his recommendation would be <br />to have just one ordinance; therefore would <br />be one publication. The other aspect is <br />changing the fees on the computer would be <br />a one time change. <br /> <br />Councilman Leary <br /> <br />Concurred with Mayor Meier that the increases <br />were 2 separate issues and part of the pro- <br />blem is that residents don't see them as <br />2 separate issues. <br /> <br />'ouncilman Cummings <br /> <br />Suggested perhaps an explanation could be <br />sent on the first bill showing the increases. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.