My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1982 03 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1982 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1982 03 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:19 PM
Creation date
7/9/2009 3:02:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
3/2/1982
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1982 03 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilwoman Morris <br /> <br />Question on Publication <br /> <br />ACCEPTANCE OF CITY ATTORNEY'S <br />REPORT <br /> <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />ROY SHELTON REQUEST - CON- <br />CURRENCE IN VACATION OF <br />EASEMENT <br /> <br />3/2/82 <br /> <br />Page -12- <br /> <br />at the present time he had a request from <br />Boulder County on South Boulder Road be- <br />tween Louisville and Lafayette. As there <br />are 3 jurisdictions involved, the county <br />is requesting a speed limit change to go <br />along with the traffic safety study done <br />by State Highway Dept. for the City of <br />Lafayette. He stated before he could <br />respond to this request, he would have to <br />have approval of council. He viewed this <br />change as a more timely and streamlining <br />procedure. <br /> <br />Expressed her concern about council's re- <br />view of speed limits also and inquired <br />what the procedure is before the ordinance <br />be put out for publication. <br />Administrator Wurl stated if councilmembers <br />would express their concerns with him and <br />staff, they would review these. If council <br />made a motion to have South Boulder Road <br />restudied and those findings presented to <br />council, this would give you an opportunity <br />to review all the variables that were involved <br />in that study. If council disagreed with <br />one of them, this could come out in that <br />session. It was his opinion that the speed <br />limits be established based on an engineer- <br />ing study. He also felt that from a legal <br />point of view, if just arbitrarily speed <br />limits~_"Q'ere:.;set, this would cause a serious <br />problem. <br />Question called for on publication of Ordin- <br />ane #735. All in favor. Notion carried 6-0. <br /> <br />Councilman Fauson moved, Councilman Cummings <br />seconded the City Attorney's report be <br />accepted and placed on file. Question called <br />for. All in favor. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Advised Council the request was from First <br />Savings Investment Co. for j::heir approval <br />for the vacation of Public Service easements. <br />The other utility companies have signed the <br />form. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.