Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2/5/82 <br /> <br />Page -7- <br /> <br />Councilman Leary inquired if the proposed l1edical <br />Center would be complimentary to the Com- <br />munity Hospital proposal. Mr. Bellock ad- <br />vised that it 'iVould. Mr. Bellock also <br />stated he was unaware of the Community Hospital <br />proposal, but the development of their <br />facility would not preclude them with any <br />plans they propose. <br /> <br />Councilwoman Morris inquired if. Mr. Bellock's <br />proposal was for one other building with <br />expanded services. <br />He replied he would like to have specialty <br />services, i.e. neurology, physical rehabili- <br />tation, therapists on a part time basis to <br />work with other doctors. <br />She then asked if Mr. Bellock would be setting <br />up requirements similiar to those of Boulder <br />Medical Center relative to doctors remaining <br />in the center for a certain length of time. <br />Mr. Bellock assured her no such requirements <br />would be set. He further explained Boulder <br />Medical Center was a corporation, whereas <br />Louisville Medical Center is a building <br />not a professional corporation that has <br />control over doctors salaries, and they <br />simply act as tenants of the building. <br /> <br />Councilman Cussen <br /> <br />Expressed his concern also relative to <br />doctors remaining at the center for a certain <br />length of time and having to sign a contract <br />to this effect. <br />Again Bellock assured him they were not <br />developing a professional corporation thru <br />this bond that would hire individual prac- <br />tioners. <br />Attorney Rautenstraus advised that a private <br />contractural agreement between doctors <br />that includes a restrictive covenant does <br />not pertain or involve the issuance of <br />Industrial Revenue Bonds. That would be <br />strictly a private matter over which- the <br />City has no control. <br />