My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1981 03 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1981 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1981 03 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:18 PM
Creation date
7/20/2009 10:49:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
3/5/1981
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1981 03 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />SETBACKS <br /> <br />ORDINANCE #715 - PUBLICATION <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #5 - RE: WATER TREAT- <br />MENT PL~~T LOCATION <br /> <br />;;1.1' ~(s <br />/l'/~/ 81 <br /> <br />Page -6- <br /> <br />Mr. Rupp stated it was at staff's <br />discretion 'which were considered minor> <br />Councilman Carnival was concerned with <br />the number of violations on set-backs, <br />~1ichprompts carelessness on the part of <br />the builder. <br />Mr. Rupp advised that the building de- <br />partment requires a foundation survey <br />be provided before the next stage of <br />construction occurs, in relation to <br />the property line. The problem is not <br />with the foundation but could be with <br />the overhang of the roof that projects <br />6" over into the setback, or the house <br />is cantilevered over the foundation. <br />Another problem has been with patios <br />that builders call accessories and not <br />considered a principle part of the <br />structure. <br />He then sta.ted that if Council wished <br />to take more firm action, his department <br />would comply. <br />Administrator Wurl suggested that per- <br />haps more information should be supplied <br />from the builders at the inception of <br />the project i.e. if patios will be added, <br />catilevers, etc. <br />After discussion Council agreed with <br />Mr. Wurl's suggestion that more in- <br />formation be obtained when the proposed <br />project brings in their plans. <br /> <br />Question called for on motion. All <br />in favor. Motion carried 4-0. <br /> <br />Noel Hobbs of Rocky Mountain Consultants, <br />advised Council an application was sub- <br />mitted almost a year ago to the Boulder <br />County Planning Commission and Boulder <br />County Commissioners for a special use <br />review for a site that would be located <br />on Marshall Road and the new pipeline <br />would by-pass Community Ditch to our <br />filter plant. Also hopefully when the <br />Coal Creek project is built our filter <br />plant will be served from this source. <br />This will be a new facility as an off- <br />site facility for Centennial Valley Mall. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.