My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1980 08 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1980 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1980 08 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:17 PM
Creation date
7/27/2009 10:02:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
8/5/1980
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1980 08 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ORDINANCE NO. 690 <br />CONT'D <br /> <br />PAUL BROOKS <br />REPRESENTING BILL SUITTS <br /> <br />COUNCIL REl\ffiRKS <br />COUNCILMAN CARNIVAL <br /> <br />POPULATION EQUIVALENCY <br /> <br />GAS DRILLING TIMING <br /> <br />Minutes Page -5- <br />August 5, 1980 <br /> <br />Mr. Drumm then reviewed the various items <br />in the Impact Statement. <br /> <br />Mayor Waschak asked if anyone was opposed <br />to Ordinance No. 690. <br /> <br />Paul Brooks, 240 Mohawk Drive, Boulder. <br />He questioned "the number of units in the <br />parcel, population equivalents and density. <br />It was his understanding that the density <br />was 2.2 for the ensuing annexations, and <br />asked if a revised study had been made <br />relative to water and sewer utilities <br />within the urban services area. <br /> <br />Mayor Waschak asked for staff remarks. <br />Attorney Joss reported that the annexation <br />petitions were complete and signed. <br /> <br />Asked that Staff respond to Mr. Brooks' <br />questions. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Rupp responded <br />he had discussed the density question <br />with Mr. Drumm at length. In the Suitts <br />development the breakdown for 411 acres <br />was 1,680 units. That represented an <br />overall density of 4.1 dwelling units <br />per acre. In the Hocheder annexation <br />request there are 126 acres to be developed <br />and 550 units - this represents 4.4 <br />dwellings per acre. In this respect it <br />was his opinion this was not inconsistant. <br /> <br />Councilman Carnival inquired about popu- <br />lation equivalency and the accuracy of <br />the Centennial Valley water treatment <br />facility. <br /> <br />Director Rupp replied research has been <br />made of what is left available in the <br />urban services area to be developed with <br />residential density so as not to exceed <br />utilities availability. <br /> <br />Councilman Carnival expressed concern <br />on the timing of the drilling in the <br />agricultural area and wanted some assur- <br />ance that the drilling would not still be <br />going on after the major portion of the <br />subdivision has been developed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.