My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1980 02 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1980 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1980 02 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:16 PM
Creation date
7/27/2009 11:08:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/5/1980
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1980 02 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Minutes - page 3 <br />February 5, 1980 <br /> <br />AUDIENCE COMMENTS <br />MESA POINT P.U.D. <br />AMENDHENT <br /> <br />Pat Hornbostel, 655 W. Hawthorne, stated that <br />he is a resident of Mesa Point subdivision <br />and when his home was built there was a set back <br />violation and he had to adjust the size because <br />a variance was denied. <br />He stated that a variance request was just <br />approved in the subdivision, and the owners of <br />property in that area were not notified of <br />the request. <br /> <br />Mr. Hornbostel reqeusted that the matter be <br />returned to the Commission and notices be sent <br />to property owners in that area. <br /> <br />Dir. Rupp stated that the code allows for single <br />family variances to be handled administratively. <br />This request involving a front yard set back <br />where the house was built 2' into the front <br />set back, and staff agreed to have it heard <br />by the Planning Commission instead of deal- <br />ing with it. <br /> <br />He stated that the public hearing notice was <br />published in the newspaper and the required <br />notice was sent to the Homeowners Association, <br />but notices were not sent to homeowners. <br /> <br />After the hearing was held, the Planning <br />Commission approved the variance. <br /> <br />Eugene DiCarlo stated that he agreed that <br />when the matter is set for public hearing the <br />proper notices should go to the property <br />owners in the surrounding area. <br /> <br />Mr. Wurl stated that he agreed notices should <br />be sent to homeowners and that in the future <br />it will be done that way. <br /> <br />After discussion Councilman Meier moved that <br />the matter be referred back to Planning <br />Commission and notices be sent out to pro- <br />perty owners in that area. Seconded by Coun- <br />cilman DelPizzo. Motion carried. <br /> <br />RICK LUCE CABLE TV <br /> <br />Rick Luce, 187 Harper St., asked what the status <br />was with the cable television companies. <br /> <br />Mr. Wurl reported that the attorney is drawing <br />up two ordinances, one dealing with the existing <br />franchise and the other outlining Cable tele- <br />vision permits, which will be considered by <br />Council. <br />He stated that there have been four companies <br />interested in the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.