My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1979 01 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1979 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1979 01 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:14 PM
Creation date
8/10/2009 11:30:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
1/16/1979
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1979 01 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ORDINANCE NO. 623 <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />CONTINUED <br /> <br />January 16, 1979 <br />Minutes - page 25 <br /> <br />Drumm: to the east. <br /> <br />Porter: What was the zoning for that additional <br />land that was annexed to the east. <br /> <br />Drumm: Part of it I believe is industrial part of <br />it is agricultural. <br /> <br />Porter: Could you tell me that part which is zoned <br />industrial now, what the comprehensive plan shows it <br />as. <br /> <br />Drumm: Well generally speaking, the present site was <br />zoned industrial and I couldn't be specific where the <br />agricultural zone, it breaks right about here. <br /> <br />Porter: In other words the comprehensive plan shows <br />that as open space land. In fact that arrow that's <br />right next to that property talks about that's land <br />to be conserved for open space, right? <br />In fact your statement a few moments ago asking any- <br />one to defy you to show where the comprehensive plan <br />has been violated. That statement was inaccurate. <br /> <br />Drumm: The comprehensive plan notes that as an <br />existing development. In our discussions with the <br />County on their plan adoption and soforth, the <br />treatment of existing development and Storage Tech <br />did exist at that time, was to be different; even <br />in our agreements then land annexed to the City <br />subsequent, but this was annexed I agree, but this <br />was an existing development. <br /> <br />Porter: Mr. Drumm, that arrow I think is attached <br />to certain words that says this is going to be <br />preserved for open space through joint efforts <br />through joint efforts of the County and the City <br />of Louisville. Isn't that basically what it says. <br /> <br />Drumm: Yes. <br /> <br />Porter: In fact, right where that arrow is is part <br />of the land that was zoned industrial upon annex- <br />ation. <br /> <br />Drumm: That is land that was being built upon, this <br />plan was adopted in 1975. <br /> <br />Porter: Could you just answer my question. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.