My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2022 11 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2022 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2022 11 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2022 5:28:35 PM
Creation date
11/15/2022 11:53:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
11/10/2022
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
428
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Min Side Yard <br />Oft <br />Oft <br />5ft <br />5ft <br />and Accessory <br />Uses Setback <br />Oft or 10ft if <br />50.5ft <br />4ft <br />6ft <br />Min Rear Yard <br />abutting a <br />Setback <br />residential <br />zone <br />Max Building <br />40ft <br />40ft-5in <br />40ft <br />42ft-1 1/4in <br />Height (Principle) <br />Max Building <br />28ft <br />None proposed <br />28ft <br />None proposed <br />Height <br />(Accessory) <br />Inclusionary Housing <br />The applicant is pursuing the fee in lieu option to satisfy requirements in the <br />Inclusionary Housing chapter of the Municipal Code. The fee amount is calculated <br />through Section 17.76.040.B and will be paid for each market -rate unit as a prerequisite <br />to receive each unit's building permit. City Council approval is required in order to <br />pursue the fee in lieu option and requires the following to be met by Councilmembers: <br />• Developments seeking to use options other than on -site location of affordable <br />housing must seek approval of their proposed use of such options from the city <br />council. The city council's decision on such proposals is discretionary and <br />legislative. The city council will consider whether the proposal will result in more <br />affordable housing, providing more of a benefit to the city, than would the <br />provision of the affordable units on -site under subsection A of this section, <br />whether practical difficulties prevent the inclusion of the affordable units on -site <br />under subsection A of this section, whether the proposal would better benefit the <br />inhabitants of the city than requiring the provision of affordable housing on -site, <br />or any other factors that may be relevant to these considerations. <br />Staff recommends approval of the fee in lieu option for this development. The North End <br />Block 11 PUD was entitled, planned, and financed for years as market rate housing <br />since its initial approval in 2017, which creates a practical difficulty in financing. The City <br />can leverage the fees though other funding sources and partnerships to achieve more <br />affordable units in an off site development compared to constructing affordable units on <br />site. <br />Comprehensive Plan <br />The subject property is located in an "urban corridor" in the Comprehensive Plan. The <br />South Boulder and Highway 42 Corridors Framework Plan section describes urban <br />corridors as including a "mix of uses including residential, commercial, retail, and park <br />land". The site includes a mix of residential, commercial, and retail uses. The density <br />range remains consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which calls for an FAR of less <br />than 0.25 and less than 25 units per acre. <br />North End Block 11 — GDP Amendment, PUD Amendment, and Final Plat Page 19 of 30 <br />PC — November 10, 2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.