My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2022 02 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2022 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2022 02 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2023 1:26:01 PM
Creation date
1/30/2023 1:14:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
2/10/2022
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 10, 2022 <br />Page 6 of 13 <br />solar access, our code does not have anything dictating roof design outside of Old <br />Town or that that stops shading on other properties. Lastly, the question regarding <br />smoke damage, staff will be issuing summary standards for the neighborhoods. If there <br />are issues that would stop or slow down rebuilding, hopefully we will address that, even <br />if they have to tear down partly or all of their house. The ordinance says the fire map <br />can change in case we need to re-classify properties, we have the freedom to do so. <br />Discussion by Commissioners: <br />Diehl says given the circumstances the City is in, this is a solution to fast track the <br />rebuild process for residents. He trusts the Planning Department in this decision. He is <br />cautious that this may need a more rigorous appeal process though. Overall, he is in <br />favor of this. <br />Howe says he likes the idea of allowing citizens to add their house to the fire map. He <br />wonders how if it is important to allow citizens to add themselves the fire map if they <br />have gone through significant damage. He likes that this process will allow the rebuild <br />process to be expedited. <br />Krantz says that from her understanding, the summary standards may not apply for all <br />neighborhoods but that the option of applying for the Minor Impact Variance is still an <br />option for them. Do I understand this correctly? <br />Howe says that Planning Commission could create a condition that not only applies to <br />structures that have structural damage but also includes damage that is not structural <br />but is also still very severe. <br />Brauneis recommends that the commissioners defer to staff and the City's legal <br />counsel on how the City has defined what damaged means and what that entails in <br />regards to this emergency ordinance. <br />Diehl mentions that a summary standard would apply to the entire neighborhood and if <br />a homeowner wanted to go outside that new standard, they would be able to get that <br />modification fast tracked. <br />Hoefner asks staff that if a neighborhood does not have a summary standard, would <br />you be able to still get the administrative 10%? <br />Zuccaro says that in reality if somebody came to us and said they were tearing down a <br />portion or all of their house and rebuilding because of fire damage, that is pretty easy to <br />document. I believe in that scenario we would apply to ordinance to them. <br />Hoefner says he thinks this is a good idea and helps folks to start rebuilding. <br />Moline agrees with the other commissioner. He appreciates that our City has the ability <br />to be flexible and is in support of this. <br />Osterman says she is in support of this motion. The intent is to provide homeowners to <br />build back in an expedited fashion and this process would allow that to happen. <br />Brauneis agrees with Commissioner of Osterman. <br />Krantz mentions that she still questions whether this emergency ordinance should <br />apply to those purchasing fire affected lots and if the Minor Impact Variance could apply <br />to those who have lost their homes. <br />Brauneis refers back to staff's comment that enforceability would be difficult and that <br />those who did not own the property at the time of fire would have different regulations <br />than those who did. <br />Diehl says that if a resident lost their home and wants to sell their lot, that is a benefit <br />still associated to the lot. <br />Brauneis asks if Commission Howe can refresh the commissioners' memory on the <br />condition to the ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.