My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2022 09 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2022 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2022 09 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2023 12:00:17 PM
Creation date
2/23/2023 10:29:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
9/6/2022
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 6, 2022 <br />Page 7 of 13 <br />Councilmember Leh noted a housing study and the Comp Plan were going to be done <br />this year but they needed to be postponed due to fire recovery. He is concerned that <br />without the full housing study, the Council may not have the data they need in order to <br />create a good process. He noted everyone on the Council supports affordable housing <br />but without understanding what the market will bear, how to incentivize the process, <br />etc., he worries we could end up discouraging any affordable housing being built if the <br />percentage is too high. He stated he is not ready to go to 30% without more information <br />and is worried this ordinance has no reasonable expectation of success. <br />Councilmember Dickinson stated there has been concern that turning commercial to <br />residential could affect sales tax, but it could also be a boon. He likes the 30% <br />requirement, likes it being on site, and not having a fee in lieu option. However, he is <br />also concerned it could be a disincentive to redevelopment for residential development. <br />He would like to see more incentives to make sure this is feasible and to show this is <br />important to us. Would prefer to see a housing study and the Comp Plan first to make <br />sure this will be successful and we actual get more affordable housing. <br />Councilmember Most stated this is very important and we need to also have incentives. <br />She would like to start with this without waiting for a housing study. Online shopping is <br />not going away and we are not likely to lose tax revenue. We need to move <br />aggressively now and we can continue to revise it if needed. <br />Councilmember Brown stated we are not under any obligation to create a profit for <br />developers, but we have an obligation to get the best development for Louisville. <br />Housing that is affordable and purposeful is the goal. We should discuss incentives, but <br />not at the delay of this ordinance. <br />Councilmember Fahey stated she is very much in favor of affordable housing, however, <br />she is less inclined to go with the requirement than to find a way to use incentives. She <br />supports getting the housing study and the Comp Plan done first to know what <br />percentage will work and what incentives are needed. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Maloney agreed that there is a sense of urgency that we need to act. <br />He noted incentives will be very important to get what we want, density, parking, etc. He <br />would like to see a broad strategy to address affordable housing across the City and <br />look at all options. Thirty percent may not be the right number, maybe it could work with <br />incentives. The 30% may just be a disincentive, we don't know without a broader <br />strategy and plan in place. <br />Public Comments — None. <br />Councilmember Most stated there are no easy answers and we simply need to move <br />forward with the areas we want to see change and building. We need to find a way for <br />the community to get what it wants now and not wait any longer. We have to find a way <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.