Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COLO. TECH. CENTER <br />CONT'D <br />COUNCILMAN DI CARLO <br /> <br />PAT ROGERS <br />COUNCILMAN DI CARLO <br />COUNCILMAN DOMENICO <br /> <br />That doesn't answer the question that was <br />asked. The State was asked what kind of <br />guides they want to use. Now, tonight I <br />get the understanding that a starting point <br />is the Amuedo & Ivey report. Is that a basis <br />or a guide that the State is going to use <br />as a starting point? <br /> <br />I think so. <br /> <br />Okay, thank you Mr. Rogers. <br /> <br />PAT ROGERS <br /> <br />I would like to ask Mr. Rogers a question. <br />Do you feel in your own mind that you are <br />satisfied with what has taken place? <br /> <br />I haven't had time to study it sir. I would <br />not judge something that has this much time <br />and effort in it. It is rather a short <br />presentation. There is no question in my <br />mind, I can't make up my mind without seeing <br />the basic data and the full package and <br />everything that goes with it. <br /> <br />MAYOR WASCHAK <br />DENNIS DRUMM <br /> <br />Any more questions from Council? <br /> <br />I have a question that I would like to ask <br />I don't want it to sound like sour grapes; <br />the City has been, I think, trying very <br />hard to have developers get accurate and <br />acceptable information on the geologic pro- <br />blem. We have a case in point right up here <br />north of Coal Creek Station, where one small <br />lot was going to be developed and we forced <br />the developer there into drilling a hole and <br />doing whatever the right thing was to do. <br />The developer did that and brought the inform- <br />ation in. Based on that it was determined <br />that the site was in fact safe for construction <br />of the structure to be built there. It is <br />my understanding that the information was <br />also submitted to the survey and yet we <br />received no response to that to my know- <br />ledge whatsoever saying yes it is safe for <br />construction, no it is not; further study is <br />needed. We received nothing. The reason I <br />mention this, as I say it, is not sour grapes. <br />What I am wondering is, is the response on <br />Mizel work going to be exactly the same? <br />Because as you well know, I think the inform- <br />ation was submitted. <br /> <br />MR. ROGER <br /> <br />Which information was submitted? This I <br />haven't seen-yet. <br /> <br />-14- <br />