My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1976 06 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1976 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1976 06 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:10 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 12:07:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/1/1976
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1976 06 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ATTORNEY MORRIS <br /> <br />The ~rinciple interest of course is in the <br />subs~dence hazard area. In our discussion <br />with Mr. Mizel for the Colo. Tech. Center, <br />we agreed to do a complete study which would <br />define the mineral resources and any other <br />engineering geological problems such as soils <br />which might be considered or developed in <br />the area. We have tried to fulfill all of <br />the obligations or answer all the questions <br />that might be raised under SB 35, HB 1041, <br />and HB 1525. The first map that we have here <br />is an engineering geological resource map of <br />the CTC. Most of the area is covered with a <br />aluvium or stream deposit consisting of silt <br />and sand and clay. We have made 12 small <br />borings. The results of those borings and <br />tests for expansive soil and corrosive soil <br />are negative. There will be no great prob- <br />lem with the soils with development. We <br />do have a minor problem with a high ground <br />water table in a certain area, which will <br />have to be considered as a foundation prob- <br />lem when they build buildings or design <br />buildings in that area. The only mineral re- <br />source is a small corner of property right <br />in here which falls on Coal Creek flood <br />plain. And this is contained within the CTC. <br /> <br />Dr. Robinson, for the record, when you point <br />to a place like that would you say the easterly <br />southerly portion of it so the record will <br />be clear. <br /> <br />COLO. TECH. CENTER <br />CONT'D <br /> <br />DR. ROBINSON <br /> <br />This is in the northwest most corner of the <br />property in the flood plain of Coal Creek. <br />There are gravel deposits, which if developed, <br />with the rest of the gravel deposits could <br />be considered economical. But, within <br />the limits of the CTC's property alone would <br />not be a deposit the size enough to be of <br />economical importance at this time. <br />Another possible mineral resource would be <br />the unmined coal. The area was underlaned <br />by coal and has been mined extensively. An <br />evaluation of what is left on the areas which <br />are not undermined we had available (of <br />course these are mine maps from the Bureau <br />of Mines), and we had drill logs available <br />from the Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. It is <br />our conclusion that there is no coal left <br />which would be economic to mine at the present <br />time. To open up these mines and go after <br />the remaining pillars, the marginal coal <br />which still underlies this land would be too <br />costly to be profitable under the present <br />conditions or forseeable conditions. So, <br /> <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.