My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1976 05 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1976 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1976 05 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:10 PM
Creation date
8/27/2009 3:51:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
5/4/1976
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1976 05 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />LAND ACQUISITION CONT'D <br /> <br />is land that the City specifically needs <br />FOR THE TANK. <br />Tracts 1 thru 5, tracts 1 & 2 are needed <br />to eliminate cow corrals, tracts 3 & 4 <br />are for the tank. Tract 5 also takes in <br />some of the buildings, the house and the <br />trailer home. Administrator Wurl's re- <br />commendation was to acquire what is need- <br />ed for the tank and enough land to keep <br />everyone out of the area ultimately by <br />fencing it. Property Brokers have an <br />agreement with the Clynckes that when they <br />sell the property they must pay the Clynkes <br />for a minimum of 5 acres. He further re- <br />commended that, since this is within the <br />amount of money allocated for land acquisi- <br />tion, the City purchase the 5 acres. <br />Councilman Caranci asked who owned the land. <br />Mr. Wurl advised Tracts 1 thru 5 was owned <br />by Property Brokers, Inc. and Tract 6 was <br />owned by the City of Lafayette. Administra- <br />tor Wurl had discussed Tract 6 with Manager <br />Felsch of the City of Lafayette, and the City <br />of Lafayette wanted further information as <br />to what our engineers felt they would have <br />left available to them where they could <br />construct additional tanks, and in the fu- <br />ture a small treatment plant. Noel Hobbs <br />provided this information to them. Some <br />of the older Lafayette Council members now <br />serving related years ago they had asked <br />Louisville to put up half the money to <br />acquire the land; and at that time Louis- <br />ville was not willing to do so. Based on <br />our original appraisal of two years ago, <br />the cost question arose. Apparently the <br />City of Lafayette now thinks the land is <br />worth twice as much per acre. Property <br />Brokers price is $3600. Lafayette's <br />proposal was $6,000 per acre. Administra- <br />tor Wurl advised Manager Felsch he was <br />certain this price would not be acceptable. <br />Manager Felsch stated the political problem <br />would have to be resolved with higher level <br />people in both city governments before the <br />problem could be resolved. His suggestion <br />and City Administrator Wurl's as well was <br />to have our Mayor and Mayor pro-tem have a <br />meeting with the gentlemen from Lafayette <br />about the price of the land. <br /> <br />12. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.