My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 09 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2009 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 09 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:49:45 AM
Creation date
11/20/2009 8:37:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2009 09 10
Document Relationships
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 09 10 PLAN SET
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)\PLANNING COMMISSION\2000-2019 Planning Commission\2009 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Pritchard and Tengler stated they do support posting the property. They would <br />support a 100' mailing notification. <br />Members of the Public: <br />Michelle Pelanne, 741 Wildrose Way, stated Boulder and Fort Collins have had <br />no complaints regarding beekeeping. Boulder has no beekeeping laws and Fort <br />Collins has an ordinance similar to the Windsor ordinance. She continued with a <br />discussion of the following sections: 6.24.040 and 6.24.120. <br />Joe Alper, 741 Wildrose Way, discussed three concerns: the concerns of others <br />regarding bee stings, the 500' notice requirement is extreme and the licensing <br />fee is too high. <br />Alper's daughter, 741 Wildrose Way, stated her agreement with the concerns <br />addressed by her parents. <br />Staff and Applicant Summary and Recommendation: <br />McCartney discussed a similar permitting process could be developed for <br />beekeeping that was developed for the Shed Location Permit when a shed is <br />less than 120 SF in area. <br />Public Hearing Closed Commission Comments: <br />Russell stated he sees no need fora notification and he would suggest Staff <br />determine the appropriate registration registrati fee. <br />Lipton stated his con <br />educate neighbors <br />bees. <br />Russell stated a r <br />and a simp:le::postin <br />Hartman state <br />suggested the registration <br />Loo stated her support of posti <br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />AUGUST 13, 2009 <br />Page 7 of 9 <br />nced and the need to <br />oung children, of the presence of <br />o the education of their neighbors <br />pert sd:`be sufficient. <br />on would serve as a means of education. She <br />ither be reduced or dropped. <br />the property and suggested staff develop the <br />details of how to post. <br />Pritchard stated the license fee of $50.00 is too much and notification could be <br />done with a signage and a mailing to 2 -3 properties on all sides of the <br />beekeepers property. <br />Tengler stated the fee should be reduced. He also supports some type of <br />notification of neighbors. <br />Roll CaII Vote: <br />Lipton moved and Russell seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 8, <br />Series 2009 with the following changes to the ordinance: eliminate the <br />requirement for the mailing notification and replace with posting the property for <br />30 -days; and reduce the licensing fee from $50.00 to $10.00. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.