My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1998 06 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1998 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1998 06 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:43 PM
Creation date
3/23/2004 2:03:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/16/1998
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1998 06 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
During the term, Sam's Club and the City will share the sales tax received by the City <br />on a 50/50 basis. After the one year term, Sam's Club will no longer be entitled to <br />any sales tax rebate and the City will receive and retain 100% thereafter. <br />The City will remm the Sam's Club portion of the sales tax on a quarterly basis but <br />only after the City has received the sales tax. <br /> <br />Davidson called for the applicant's presentation. <br /> <br />Walter Koelbel, Jr., Koelbel & Company, stated their request was correctly articulated by Light. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council questions and comments. <br /> <br />Sisk expressed disapproval of a sales tax rebate to WalMart Corporation. He feels Council would <br />be setting a precedent for sales tax rebates from future developments. <br /> <br />Lathrop replied that he feels rebating approximately $450 thousand in return for a higher quality <br />building and projected sales tax revenues of almost $1 million per year is a wise investment for the <br />City. <br /> <br />Levihn stated that he has received numerous citizen comments in support of Sam's Club locating <br />in Louisville and the proposed sales tax rebate agreement. <br /> <br />Howard stated that he is opposed to government subsidizing large entities but the City of Louisville <br />and its citizens can reap tremendous benefits from the sales tax revenue Sam's Club will generate. <br />Council cannot legally deny Sam's Club to develop in Louisville, but they can require that the <br />building be aesthetically appealing, and this is what they have done. <br /> <br />Keany stated his feelings are divided on this development. As a result of Sam's Club locating in <br />Louisville, another major retailer has shown interest in locating here. The restaurants and gas stations <br />located around this area stand to benefit from the ability of Sam's Club to draw people to their store. <br />He does not feel that Council is giving away funds from the City coffers, rather they are rebating a <br />small percentage of the revenue generated by Sam's Club. <br /> <br />Davidson responded to the implication that the City of Louisville does not subsidize the smaller, <br />independently owned businesses. He staed the City has spent over $4.3 million over the past six <br />years to improve the downtown business district, for which most cities would charge the property <br />owner. In response to setting a precedent, he reminded Council that they waived $100 thousand in <br />landscape improvements under the previous design guidelines for Home Depot. Many of the <br />surrounding communities are using money that would normally go to the school district to bring <br />retail into their cities, and try to out-bid one another with incentives for retailers to locate within their <br />community. He agreed with Sisk but is in favor of the rebate agreement. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.