Laserfiche WebLink
however, also approved were a conceptual site plan for the entire park, typical building elevations <br />and a specific materials and colors board. It was noted on the PUD documents that the CDDSG <br />would apply to individual lot Final PUD applications. A site plan for this extended stay hotel was <br />part of the conceptual master plan. The site plan presented is very consistent with the approved <br />conceptual plan. No specific architecture for this building was presented during the previous review. <br />Since the previous City Council review of this application, the applicant has removed all parking <br />from the area between the building and City open space (Parcel S-3). The building meets the 50-foot <br />minimum setback from Parcel S-3 and parking is set back a minimum of 32-feet from that parcel. <br />Along the west property line, the CDDSG required building setback is 25-feet for building footprints <br />greater than 30,000 sf. The applicant is proposing a setback varying between 17 and 28-feet. The <br />Planning Commission approved the setback exception based upon the following factors: 1) the <br />approved office building on the lot to the west is set back significantly from this property line, and <br />2) the 25-foot setback was designed primarily to deal with large box-like structures, whereas this <br />building is just over the 30,000 sf trigger and the west building wall has a great deal of structural <br />articulation. The landscape plan meets CDDSG requirements and the concepts approved during the <br />overall Final PUD. The plan has been revised to meet Planning Commission conditions regarding <br />landscaping; though, one minor clarification is needed and staff is recommending one additional <br />condition. The building is proposed as a two-story brick structure with a full pitched roof at the 35- <br />foot maximum height. Materials are consistent with the approved material and color palette and will <br />generally match those approved for the signature building. Several changes have been made to add <br />greater interest to the masonry detailing. The Planning Commission recommended that the amount <br />of EIFS be increased and that it be added to all sides of the building. That recommended change has <br />not been made. Parking lot lighting complies with the design approved on the overall PUD and <br />CDDSG minimum lighting level requirements. Lighting has been added along the sidewalks leading <br />to the main building entry and no wall-mounted lighting is proposed. One pole light is proposed for <br />the 'sport court' outdoor recreation area. Staff recommends that the lighting on the 'sport court' be <br />limited to 250-watt metal halide, cut off and downcast fixtures. If that is not acceptable to the <br />applicant, a limitation on the hours the light could be used would also be an appropriate restriction. <br />Ground-mounted monument signs have been eliminated from the proposal, other than small, <br />directional signs. The location of the directional signs should be shown on the plan and subject to <br />staff review and approval. The proposed sign facing Dillon Road would be constructed of individual <br />reverse pan channel letters, which would be back-lit, consistent with signs previously approved for <br />this development. Lettering detail should be added to the PUD plan sheets, including colors. During <br />Planning Commission review, details on the signage proposal were not sufficiently clear. The <br />Commission required that the sign package come back before the Commission for their full review <br />and approval; however, it is not their intent that this requirement hold up the possible approval of <br />the overall project. The City's existing zoning code does not define hotels so as to specifically <br />include or exclude extended stay hotels. Staff recommends that no building permits be issued for <br />individual room kitchen facilities in the Residence Inn until such time as a zoning code amendment <br />is approved that allows such facilities as a permitted use in the CB zoning district. The Planning <br />Commission approved this application, with twenty-one conditions. With a few minor exceptions, <br />those conditions have been met. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />