My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1998 08 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1998 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1998 08 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:44 PM
Creation date
4/2/2004 10:51:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
8/18/1998
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1998 08 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mayer feels that a set of guidelines integrating all the demands from the business community and <br />the residents is necessary to determine what can reasonably be accommodated. <br /> <br />Davidson requested that staff present a plan that includes constraints, such as parking and how much <br />traffic can the road system take, and what is the availability of long-term parking versus short-term <br />parking, for Council to review prior to establishing any interim guidelines. <br /> <br />Keany suggested placing a moratorium on accepting applications for expanded buildings until these <br />guidelines have been established. <br /> <br />Levihn stated he feels that a parking plan and Downtown Design Guidelines are needed before <br />Council approves anything. After reviewing the responses to the DBA parking survey, which was <br />only answered by twenty people, half of those responding stated they will not support a tax for <br />downtown parking. Council was told that the majority of people would support a tax. The numbers <br />seem to indicate that the City is going to end up paying for more and more parking. He agreed with <br />Keany regarding a moratorium. <br /> <br />Davidson directed staffto prepare a moratorium for the next City Council meeting and hold a public <br />hearing on it. In the meantime, staff should also prepare an alternative, listing acceptable constraints <br />for temporary criteria. <br /> <br />Keany questioned whether the City should continue to accept applications in the meantime. <br /> <br />Sam Light, City Attomey, replied the last moratorium was for telecommunications facilities and the <br />City agreed to accept applications but there was a moratorium on the processing of any applications. <br />If a PUD application for a building downtown was submitted to the City tomorrow, the City would <br />have to accept it and begin processing it. It would be a debatable legal point as to whether the City <br />would have to carry it forward under the standards in existence tomorrow. <br /> <br />Keany asked whether it would be possible to construct and pass a moratorium tonight that would <br />prevent the City from processing applications until such time that Council desires or sets a deadline. <br /> <br />Light replied that if Council imposes a moratorium, they would essentially alter the City's land use <br />ordinances, which would require passing an ordinance. If Council so desires, one could be drafted <br />and put in place tonight as an emergency ordinance enacted this evening. <br /> <br />Mayer suggested Council apply the parking limits from the CCDSG to each application until these <br />issues are resolved. <br /> <br />Lathrop agreed with Mayer. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.