My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1980 04 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1980 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1980 04 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:47 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 11:04:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
4/1/1980
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1980 04 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
410 <br /> 411=118,n 1980 r Pap <br /> ORDINANCE NO. 677 interviewed the different c o ate <br /> have selected one. He noted that CONTINUED is and <br /> reason for the request was that he will <br /> be given the fountain States Video pole <br /> contract if the City selects Jour Inter- . <br /> cable to service the area which will <br /> save about 6 soothe in work time. <br /> He noted that Mountain States Video has <br /> agreed to the transfer of the pole con- <br /> tract which is legal, however, the pre- <br /> sent franchise must stay in force to <br /> keep the pole contract active. <br /> Councilman Caranci stated that he felt <br /> that since 1971 there should have been <br /> better communication and felt the ordinance <br /> should be revoked. <br /> Councilman Meier questioned whether tabling <br /> this ordinance action would in some way <br /> give Jones Intercable the upperhand since <br /> they would already have a pole contract. <br /> Mt. Wurl responded that he did not feel <br /> that other companies would be concerned, <br /> and if all the companies were very close <br /> in the running, it may help Jones, depending <br /> on when Louisville wants cable television. <br /> Councilman Carnival asked if there can be <br /> more then one contract awarded. Mr. Jones <br /> stated that in order to get a pole contract <br /> the company must first have a franchise <br /> with a municipality. <br /> Mayor Waichak closed the public hearing. <br /> After discussion Councilman Caranci moved <br /> that Ordinance No. 677 be adopted. Se- <br /> conded by Councilman Fauson. Roll call. <br /> Ayes: Caranci, Fauson. <br /> Nos: Domenico, DslPizzo, Meier, Carnival. <br /> Motion defeated. <br /> • <br /> Attorney Joss gave an opinion that the state <br /> statutes do not reflect • specific time <br /> frame to return this ordinance and therefore <br /> could be brought up again at any time. <br /> ORDINANCE NO. 678 All members of Council had before them a <br /> ANDERSON ANNEXATION copy of Ordinance No. 678 for their review <br /> FIRST READING and files. <br /> SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE Attorney Joss read Ordinance No. 678 on <br /> first reading by title only. <br /> Councilman DelPizzo moved that Ordinance <br /> No. 678 be ordered published and a public <br /> hearing be set for April 15, 1980. Seconded <br /> by Councilman Caranci. Motion carried. 6-0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.