Laserfiche WebLink
Aiwa• <br /> i •'L.J .,T•,*,.: <br /> t 19,- i960 <br /> • <br /> MIKA = $0. 692 Attorney read the ordinance on •second <br /> COITTKID reading by title only. Mayor Vazobaak <br /> opened the public hearing. There were <br /> no audience comments. <br /> • <br /> Council oomm ntst <br /> Councilmen Towson stated that in see. 11.asmor. <br /> it be changed to state that City Counc <br /> can call' for a revi.v or direct the nano-' <br /> nir g Commission to call for revisor. <br /> Re stated that he did not feel the Planning <br /> Commission should call for review without <br /> the direction of the Council. <br /> Councilman Fauson felt this would keep the <br /> Council better informed as to what is going <br /> on and not be caught in the middle if <br /> Planning would call a special review and , <br /> then recommend the matter to Council for <br /> decision. <br /> Omncilman Caranci stated that he did not <br /> agree with Councilman Fauson since the <br /> Planning Commission does the most com- <br /> plete study before it is presented to Coun- <br /> cil and felt that they should be able to <br /> call for review if the feel it is necessary. <br /> Councilman Carnival agreed with Councilman <br /> Caranci and felt the Ordinance should stay <br /> as is, this way the Planning Commission <br /> can follow up on their recommendations to <br /> make sure they are carried out properly. <br /> Mr. Wurl asked if all three criteria noted <br /> on the ordinance must be incomplete before <br /> a review can be called. <br /> Dir. Rupp stated that it should be that if <br /> only one of the criteria is not met a <br /> review can be called. <br /> After discussion Councilman Caranci moved <br /> that section 16.28.040 be amended to state <br /> " In the event no subdivision agreement has <br /> been executed no construction or required <br /> improvements initiated or no building <br /> permits issued withing^12 months after final <br /> approval " Seconded by Councilman <br /> Caranci. Motion carried 3-1 Fauson op- <br /> posing. <br /> Under section 17.08.403 Recreation Ent. <br /> Councilman Fauson stated that he was op- <br /> posed to Recreational Ent. being allowed <br /> in agricultural zones and felt they should <br /> be considered under commercial. <br />