My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1980 09 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1980 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1980 09 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:47 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 11:12:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
9/2/1980
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1980 09 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Aiwa• <br /> i •'L.J .,T•,*,.: <br /> t 19,- i960 <br /> • <br /> MIKA = $0. 692 Attorney read the ordinance on •second <br /> COITTKID reading by title only. Mayor Vazobaak <br /> opened the public hearing. There were <br /> no audience comments. <br /> • <br /> Council oomm ntst <br /> Councilmen Towson stated that in see. 11.asmor. <br /> it be changed to state that City Counc <br /> can call' for a revi.v or direct the nano-' <br /> nir g Commission to call for revisor. <br /> Re stated that he did not feel the Planning <br /> Commission should call for review without <br /> the direction of the Council. <br /> Councilman Fauson felt this would keep the <br /> Council better informed as to what is going <br /> on and not be caught in the middle if <br /> Planning would call a special review and , <br /> then recommend the matter to Council for <br /> decision. <br /> Omncilman Caranci stated that he did not <br /> agree with Councilman Fauson since the <br /> Planning Commission does the most com- <br /> plete study before it is presented to Coun- <br /> cil and felt that they should be able to <br /> call for review if the feel it is necessary. <br /> Councilman Carnival agreed with Councilman <br /> Caranci and felt the Ordinance should stay <br /> as is, this way the Planning Commission <br /> can follow up on their recommendations to <br /> make sure they are carried out properly. <br /> Mr. Wurl asked if all three criteria noted <br /> on the ordinance must be incomplete before <br /> a review can be called. <br /> Dir. Rupp stated that it should be that if <br /> only one of the criteria is not met a <br /> review can be called. <br /> After discussion Councilman Caranci moved <br /> that section 16.28.040 be amended to state <br /> " In the event no subdivision agreement has <br /> been executed no construction or required <br /> improvements initiated or no building <br /> permits issued withing^12 months after final <br /> approval " Seconded by Councilman <br /> Caranci. Motion carried 3-1 Fauson op- <br /> posing. <br /> Under section 17.08.403 Recreation Ent. <br /> Councilman Fauson stated that he was op- <br /> posed to Recreational Ent. being allowed <br /> in agricultural zones and felt they should <br /> be considered under commercial. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.