My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 08 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1982 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 08 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:50 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 12:03:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
8/3/1982
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1982 08 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> 7/20/82 Page -7- <br /> Height of the structure will be 27 ft. <br /> One concern stiff had was the appearance <br /> of the structure from the highway. Public <br /> Service Co. has made sincere efforts to <br /> help mitigate the appearance with landscaping. <br /> Lanterman advised there is no subdivision <br /> agreement as there are no public improvements <br /> required on the project. Planning Commission <br /> unanimously recommended approval for the <br /> special review use and the final plat. <br /> David K. Howard, 5909 E. 38th Ave . <br /> Denver, CO Introduced himself and stated he was land use <br /> supervisor for the Public Service Co. Larry <br /> Keith, Landscape Architect was also in atten- <br /> dance to answer any of Council's questions. <br /> Councilman Leary Inquired of Administrator Wurl as to the <br /> status of speaking with Public Service Co. <br /> about the joint access on the top of the <br /> hill. stated <br /> Administrator Wurl/it was his opinion that <br /> Mr. Tanaguchi had been in contact with <br /> Public Service Co. on this issue, as well <br /> as a representative from the LDS Church. <br /> Mr. Howard stated that he was present at <br /> the Planning Commission the evening Neodata's <br /> proposal was presented and the statement <br /> was made that they had no response from Public <br /> Service Co. This is his responsibility and <br /> he handed Mr. Tanaguchi his card and stated <br /> he did not appreciate the insinuation that <br /> they were not responding, wished to know <br /> whom he had contacted. The Company had <br /> had a phone call from Mr. Tanaguchi but <br /> there was no follow-up on what was occuring. <br /> Howard felt it was a good joint use - didn t <br /> know of any reason Public Service Co. would <br /> oppose the access providing they could see <br /> a plan that would not jeopardize their trans- <br /> mission system. As long as there was ade- <br /> quate clearance from any of their structures <br /> the Company would be happy to entertain a joint <br /> use of their transmission right-of-way. This <br /> was their official position on this. <br /> Administrator Wurl advised it was his opinion <br /> that Tanaguchi had written to the LDS Church <br /> representatives requesting that they join <br /> with Neodata's request to the Public Service <br /> Co. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.