My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1984 07 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1984 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1984 07 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:53 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 1:28:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
7/17/1984
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1984 07 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. <br /> Special Meeting, Citouncll <br /> ` June 30, 1984 Minutes <br /> Page 2 <br /> however, due to key components/materials delayed and on back-order, <br /> it will not be completed until arid-August, with the very final in <br /> October. Louisville's 2 filter plants cannot produce treated water <br /> at the levels designed. The design capacity of the north treatment <br /> plant is 5.5 MGD provided adequately sized pretreatment and optimum <br /> filter runs over .several maximum days. However, staff has concluded <br /> from our own and Isis that due to additional hydraulic constrictions <br /> limiting plant #1 quite seriously, the maximum gross production <br /> capability is 3.2 MGD. The backwash process uses 0.20 to 0.60 NG <br /> which reduces our "net" production for public use. Backwash under <br /> peaking conditions. at flows under 2.5MGD requires 200 ,000 gallons , <br /> more or less . With the reduced pretreatment detentions under peak <br /> loadings , the dirtier filter runs will often require up to 600 ,000 <br /> gallons per day. This is an 18% backwash consumption versus normal <br /> 5% to 7%. Therefore a gross production of 3.2MGD will net 2.7 MGD <br /> after backwash. Any sustained demands cannot be met, and drafting <br /> of the 3 MG storage tank results. <br /> Kasch continued that the plant's limitations were not discovered <br /> prior to our investigations , because 1 ) a belief that the pre- <br /> treatment was the major and sole problem; 2) No real demand to <br /> investigate the total plant hydraulics since all major components are <br /> sized for ultimate capacity, and; 3) Sketchy recordkeeping and data <br /> prior to late 1983, and not having the demands to push the plant to <br /> its limit. <br /> Obviously from the attached production/demand chart, the hydraulic <br /> improvements significantly double the production from Plant #1 . <br /> The hydraulic improvements by themselves would not increase total <br /> production without the pretreatment. Onus dependent upon the other, <br /> and they should be viewed as one project, therefore, staff presents <br /> Fast Track #1 and Fast Track #2, for your approval as follows : <br /> Fast Track #1 1 ) New backwash pump system, vault, electrical , etc. <br /> 2) Yard piping modifications to facilitate Plant #1 <br /> hydraulics. Total cost $130 ,000 <br /> Fast Track #2 1 ) Plant #1 piping and metering improvements . <br /> 2) Expanded chemical pacing capabilities. <br /> Total cost $35,000. <br /> Phase I Howard Berry Plant is currently in Engineering , and will be <br /> "on-line" for load season, 1986. <br /> Mayor asked if after the filter plant work is completed , would we <br /> be up to capacity? <br /> Bill Schuler, Rocky Mountain Consutants , answered yes , it should be <br /> full capacity. <br /> Council members asked Schuler and Klee questions pertaining to the <br /> memorandums sent from RMC concerning different numbers of MGD. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.