Laserfiche WebLink
passed unanimously. <br /> RECESS Mayor Meier called for a short recess. <br /> RESOLUTION #10 - RESIDENTIAL <br /> ANNEXATION POLICY • <br /> Upon Council's request at the last Council <br /> meeting. staff sent the concerns and comaents to <br /> the Planning Commission along with a draft policy. <br /> The Commission reviewed the policy at their May 14 <br /> meeting and the revised policy is in the form of a <br /> resolution. <br /> The revised policy does not reference Planned <br /> Areas per Council 's direction and added an <br /> addendum that deliniatea how the City would <br /> propose to undertake the fiscal analysis and how <br /> the City would administer same. Also highlighted <br /> in the policy are some differences between <br /> "enclaves" and "adjacent properties". <br /> Mayor Meier moved that the policy be reviewed a <br /> year from the date of adoption. Fauson seconded <br /> and the motion was approved unanimously. <br /> Both Morris and Leary contended that there would <br /> be specific times when a long "drawn out" process <br /> in implementing this annexation policy would be <br /> unnecessary in that an "up-front" known factor <br /> might justify quick denial or approval , i.e. , not <br /> enough water supply or a very small enclave with <br /> one or a very few houses already receiving City <br /> water, etc. <br /> Mayor Meier felt that staff discretion would be <br /> used to make recommendations to Council with <br /> regard to the above stated scenarios. <br /> Mayor Meier moved that Council adopted Resolution <br /> #10, Series 1985, with the additional information <br /> regarding demands for service. Luce seconded and <br /> the motion was approved unanimously. <br /> U.S. 36 INTERCHANGE <br /> REVIEW The Cities of Louisville and Broomfield and <br /> Boulder County initiated a study to assess the <br /> need and feasibility of a new interchange on U.S. <br /> 36 between the Broomfield and Superior <br /> interchanges. PRC Engineering Inc. , and TransPlan <br /> Associate Inc. were retained to conduct the study. <br /> The Executive Summary of the study was distributed <br /> earlier this week. The Planning Commission <br /> reviewed tho study at their May 14 meeting and had <br /> an opportunity to question the consultants. They <br /> did not review or comment on the potential land <br /> 7 <br />