My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1987 03 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1987 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1987 03 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:57 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 2:44:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
3/16/1987
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1987 03 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Bohr stated that Council would not want to <br /> threaten the availability of water to anyone <br /> within the City's corporate limits especially with <br /> fomart having their infrastructure in place ready <br /> to develop. W. do have an agreement (with <br /> Superior) right now and if we are going to change <br /> that agreement, I think we have to be very serious <br /> about what our responsibilities are to our <br /> citizens.' <br /> Ballston stated that another thing that the Town of <br /> Superior could offer to Louisville is the joint <br /> upansion of facilities. <br /> Anderson asked it anything has changed for the <br /> City of Louisville since the time the original <br /> Agreement was drafted that would prompt Louisville <br /> to seek changes or be interested in dealing with <br /> proposed changes at this time. <br /> Rundley stated that the original Agreement was <br /> entered into mutually by both parties with both <br /> parties benefiting. Superior had a large part in <br /> drafting that Agreement and was entered into with <br /> considerable forethought. Bundiey feels that the <br /> amended agreement is a major rewrite of the <br /> original Agreement. <br /> Referring to a statement by Ms. Rolston regarding <br /> a letter sent to the Mayor of Superior, Hundley <br /> stated that after some initial discussions with <br /> Superior late in 1986 when they were considering <br /> the Rock Creek Ranch project, he indicated in this <br /> letter that instead of having to rely on a large <br /> project like this to achieve a water system, <br /> there would seem to be other avenues for Superior <br /> to pursue such as a Community Development Block <br /> Grant. The fact that the Rock Creek Project has <br /> been incorporated into the Town of Superior adds • <br /> different dimension than was originally there, <br /> Rundiey stated, and on the basis of what was <br /> submitted, Rundle)? advised Council that it doesn't <br /> make any sense to entertain seriously the revised <br /> agreement am it stands. If any alterations are <br /> considered, they should be marginal. <br /> Anderson stated that he has a problem with getting <br /> into a counter proposal mode when in fact <br /> Louisville did not solicit a proposal to begin <br /> with. If there is a need for any changes, it <br /> would have to be within the boundaries of <br /> something that is possible. Anderson asked what <br /> prompted Superior's proposed amendment. <br /> B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.