Laserfiche WebLink
Balaton stated that the letter frost Handley to <br /> Mayor Asti prompted Superior to look into CDBC <br /> funds and that an application has been submitted <br /> for $500,000 with committee hearings on March 19. <br /> Given the fact that Superior has now made applica- <br /> tion and an engineer is pursuing preliminary engineer <br /> 8 to attach to the Louisville water system,, <br /> Balaton stated that the Town Board felt it was <br /> time to submit any changes to Louisville. <br /> Anderson asked how grant ponies and the proposed <br /> aaendaent to the Agreement are tied together. <br /> Rolston stated the Board will be meeting the next <br /> night to discuss provisions addressed in the <br /> original Agreement l.a., limitations on population <br /> growth and other things that some members of the <br /> Board 'feel that they can't live with.• Belston <br /> further stated that it was somewhat of a surprise <br /> to read in today's newspaper that water to <br /> Superior would not be available until 1991. `If <br /> that is the case, we certainly have to pull back <br /> our grant application.• •If our 1982 Water <br /> Service Agreement is still in force, what would be <br /> earliest year that we (Superior) could hope to <br /> attach to the Louisville system." <br /> Anderson asked if K. Walston questioned whether <br /> the Agreement was in force. Ma. Belston responded <br /> that she was assured by Hundley that it was. <br /> Sackett stated that he felt uncomfortable with <br /> negotiating tonight on the proposed amended <br /> agreement. Although it may be proper for Superior <br /> to make such a proposal, negotiating tonight would <br /> not be the time. However, if there is anyway to <br /> work with the Town of Superior without <br /> jeopardising the future of Louisville, then <br /> Council may want to look at this as a first step <br /> in that procedure. There is a lot of work that <br /> would have to be done in order to begin that <br /> process. <br /> Szymanski stated that the proposed amended agree- <br /> ment is clearly unacceptable to Louisville. Be <br /> would encourage staff discussion in the future and <br /> coati up with something that may be agreeable to <br /> both sides. However, this proposal is not the <br /> starting point at all. Szymanski stated that he <br /> would like to know what Superior's motive and long <br /> term goal is with regard to this agreement. •They <br /> want us to supply all of Rock Creek Ranch with <br /> water. I think that is the ultimate motive and I <br /> don't think that's at all in Louisville's best <br /> interest. <br /> 9 <br />