Laserfiche WebLink
obtained 70 signatures, all supporting his request <br /> for a liquor license. <br /> Tonight is the scheduled public hearing and notice <br /> of same was published August 19, 1987 and August 26. <br /> 1987. The premises has been appropriately posted <br /> with a public hearing notice. The application is in <br /> order and all fess have been paid. <br /> Mayor Pauson opened the public hearing and asked for <br /> anyone wishing to speak either in favor of or in <br /> opposition to the issuance of a restaurant liquor <br /> license for Benitos, 950 Spruce Street. None. <br /> Mr. Espinoza addressed Council explaining his desire <br /> to open a restaurant in Louisville and asked that he <br /> be granted the restaurant liquor license. <br /> Mayor Fauson closed the public hearing and moved <br /> that Council approve the application for a <br /> restaurant liquor license for Benito's at 950 Spruce <br /> Street. Anderson seconded. By Roll Call Vote, the <br /> motion to grant a restaurant license for Benito's <br /> was passed unanimously. <br /> (Councilman Sackett arrived at this point of the Council Meeting) <br /> CML REQUEST FOR FUNDS - TELECOMMUNICATION <br /> REGULATIONS eundley explained that the Colorado Municipal League <br /> has requested a voluntary contribution from the City <br /> of Louisville S652_$9 to enable CML to participate <br /> in pending telecommunication deregulation rate <br /> proceedings. <br /> Mayor Fauson, who serves on the CML Executive Board, <br /> stated that it was determined by the Board that it <br /> would be desirable for the League to become involved <br /> in deregulation proceedings on behalf of partici- <br /> pating municipalities. The objective is to ensure <br /> that the telecommunication services remain regulated <br /> unless adequate competition exists for services and <br /> to avoid excessive rates. The amount request from <br /> each municipality is based on 7 cents par resident <br /> of each participating municipality. The League has <br /> put a $50,000 cap on the amount spent in this <br /> effort. <br /> Handley stated that in 1985 there was a solicitation <br /> by the League on a similar matter. The action taken <br /> in 1986, Mountain Bell requested $143 million in <br /> rate increases and eventually through participation <br /> of CML as well as others, the rate increase was <br /> reduced to $21 million. <br /> 2 <br />