Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.~I <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />had the opportunity to decide whether or <br />not they were going to commit to that <br />annexation agreement as a binding <br />agreement as part of the Northwest <br />Parkway document. She did indicate that <br />she had been discussing this with the <br />city of Broomfield and she would <br />continue to do so. It was my <br />understanding that there would not be a <br />down zoning required but there would be <br />some regulations of parcels of property, <br />the Glacier view Property. The revised <br />draft did make it clear that Boulder <br />County would be acquiring the open space <br />land and that would not be an obligation <br />of the other parties to the agreement. I <br />was also advised that the agreement <br />would be made clear that Louisville <br />could volunteerly acquire any of the <br />open space land. I did discuss the <br />desire for a buffer between Louisville <br />and Broomfield along Carbon Road and I <br />was advised that would appear in the <br />next draft of the agreement. <br /> <br />I did request that a non-severability <br />cause be placed in the agreement so that <br />if for some reason the annexation <br />agreement with Broomfield would be ruled <br />to be invalid, so that Louisville would <br />not be in the position of having agreed <br />to this document and then having found <br />that portions of this was not valid. <br />Since Broomfield has not agreed to the <br />agreement they would not have agreed to <br />the non-severability clause in the <br />agreement. The grade-separation <br />interchange, at this time is being <br />addressed by the technical committee. <br />Maintenance of the parkway was still <br />unsettled. There was a question whether <br />or not there would be reimbursement <br />proposed for private funding of the 96th <br />Interchange and I was advised at this <br />time that is not part of the plan. <br /> <br />I was told that I would be able to see a <br />copy of the revised agreement today <br />before the Council meeting. I did get a <br />copy of the revised agreement in my <br />office at 6:30 p.m. I have it with me, <br />but it came through on the fax machine <br />and the copy is very poor. I am to get <br />a better copy and when I do I will get <br />it around to each of you. I did <br /> <br /> <br />12 <br />