My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1991 02 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1991 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1991 02 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:32 PM
Creation date
6/16/2006 11:16:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/5/1991
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1991 02 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> ..11 <br /> plan cannot be changed without the <br /> support of a MTA member in the county <br /> where the change is to occur. <br /> Brand: All of the land that the people own in <br /> Glacier Park will go into new ownership <br /> in September, but they have the freedom <br /> to sell the land or any parcel of it <br /> before that time and they have been <br /> negotiating with Boulder County. The <br /> County would like to enter into an <br /> agreement with them to buy the land, if <br /> the legislature sends this question to <br /> the people for a vote. <br /> Carnival: Asked about the Varra property. <br /> Franklin: At the attorneys meeting a <br /> representative from Broomfield thought <br /> that there might be a petition submitted <br /> by Varra. <br /> Brand: Stated that Broomfield has not yet <br /> received a formal petition. Broomfield <br /> stated that they had discouraged Mr. <br /> Varra from doing so. <br /> Carnival: It seems that we are getting away from a <br /> transportation issue and getting into an <br /> annexation issues and open space agree- <br /> ments. <br /> Davidson: Stated that his concern was if there <br /> was an election and that came up no and <br /> no parkway was built then they don't buy <br /> the land. I would hate to think they <br /> were going to buy the land then that <br /> goes to an election and people say no, I <br /> think there might be a good chance that <br /> might happen, then they buy the land <br /> anyway and then there's no parkway. All <br /> a of sudden there is a big chunk of <br /> Louisville commercial/industrial gone. <br /> I echo some of the same concerns that <br /> Councilman Carnival has. I am not <br /> willing to give up all kinds of things <br /> so Broomfield and Superior can gain a <br /> road. If we can go along the original <br /> lines of the compromise, then I am still <br /> in favor of it. Anything that costs <br /> Louisville anything, you have just lost <br /> my vote. <br /> Brand: In my conversion with Ron Stewart, we <br /> 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.