Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-- <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />consideration of access to Louisville because of <br />the at grade intersections that are proposed at <br />Broomfield will preclude efficient access from <br />Louisville to the airport and I think that is <br />something that needs to be considered. The <br />96th/Dillon Road intersection is something that <br />you need to pay attention to. I think it is the <br />paramount access that Louisville will have to the <br />parkway. I think that is the place where <br />Louisville is going to really benefit the most. <br />That is the area left in Louisville for us to <br />develop the 800 acres and I think that needs to be <br />paid attention to. The 96th street Interchange <br />that Broomfield and Interlocken are clearly <br />pushing in conjunction with the parkway is also <br />something that needs considerable attention paid <br />to it. We paid for out interchange, let them pay <br />for theirs. I think we need to pay attention to <br />what we are gaining. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Ken Hoyle, 10101 Dillon Road. <br /> <br />Hoyle: If any of you would like to see the area that we <br />are talking about please call me and I will be <br />happy to you on a tour of that area. <br /> <br />Davidson: My support for this parkway is dependent upon it <br />being a compromise and dependent upon a lot of <br />things. When you start doing tolling and you <br />start doing a parkway authority I get fears of the <br />great big "W". My support of a compromise is a <br />parkway not a W-470. If these things remain in the <br />final agreement I would find it difficult to <br />support it. I think it is a different approach <br />than what has been put forward from the beginning. <br />A foothills parkway type of road I can support, <br />the minute that you start to turn it into <br />something else my support dies on it. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: The tolling and parkway authority suggestions are <br />coming from Jefferson County. They will be <br />discussed. <br /> <br />Davidson: Section 5 Page 6 in the middle of the section, <br />this sentence needs to be looked at or taken out <br />or modified. <br /> <br />Griffiths: I think this is a very important issue. To me the <br />intent of the language was to make it clear that <br />Louisville had the opportunity to annex that land <br />and if it voluntarily choose not to do so then <br />that is fine. I think we should go back and work <br />on the language. <br /> <br /> <br />9 <br />