My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1991 06 13
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1991 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1991 06 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:33 PM
Creation date
6/16/2006 11:52:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/13/1991
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1991 06 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />".,1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Phare: The pumping in the North Plant would basical- <br />ly be eliminated except in extreme demands <br />such as a fire flow. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: I was trying to figure out where everything <br />fits in together and that this is in addition <br />to the North Plant and the pumping would go <br />to the south rather than having it pump <br />through the high zone at the north. <br /> <br />Phare: The North Plant provides another redundancy <br />to pump. It didn't have enough capacity to <br />do the backwash that we talked about. <br /> <br />Klee: Pumping from the North Plant has a 40% in- <br />crease in energy consumption versus pumping <br />from the South Plant. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: Is there any time that they might drain and <br />check the Louisville Reservoir? I think the <br />clay liner is leaking. <br /> <br />Phare: There's no question that the Louisville <br />Reservoir leaks, all reservoirs that are <br />built in that vintage leak. Certainly once <br />this facility is in place and we are attached <br />to Marshall Lake and we have a vessel that is <br />twenty times the size we will have a lot more <br />flexibility in doing that. If we were to <br />ever work on the Louisville Reservoir we <br />would have to find a system to bypass the <br />reservoir itself because we could not meet <br />peaks demands in the summer without both <br />plants functioning, but it does give us an <br />opportunity in the fall, winter, and spring. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: Question, when Council approves the contract <br />will the costs remain fixed or will the City <br />be responsible to pay additional costs asso- <br />ciated with the construction? <br /> <br />Phare: Engineering fees are fixed provided we don't <br />have them do something above and beyond what <br />is identified in their scope of work. The <br />cost of the physical structures are not <br />guaranteed and are not guaranteed by any <br />consultant. We watch cost at each and every <br />meeting, we are always asking what is the <br />cost implication of this option versus that <br />one. If you are looking at numbers we have a <br />l5% contingency built in there, hopefully we <br />won't need all of that. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.