Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ..,1 <br />Baysinger: That was done before my time and they were negotiated <br /> into that contract. <br />Davidson: Since Sharon is the one who receives this data, does she <br /> have any objections to them changing the dates? <br />Baysinger: I did run that by Sharon. The audited figures for RSL <br /> are for RSL as a company as a whole not for the <br /> individual golf courses. <br />Howard moved that Council adopt the amendments to the Personal Services Agreement <br />authorize the Mayor to execute these amendments to the agreement, seconded by Sackett. <br />All in favor. <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION - MCCASLIN BLVD. ACCESS ROAD <br />Tom Phare, Director of Public Works was directed at the May 21, 1991 Council meeting <br />to proceed with construction of the project but to coordinate with Boulder County Public <br />Works on access issues. The issue regarding access was that of the location and feasibility <br />of a frontage drive in lieu of right in/right out access for properties along the west side of <br />McCaslin Blvd. Through the coordinated efforts of the County Public Works Department, <br />City Staff and design engineers it has been determined a frontage drive located east of the <br />power poles can be constructed provided some adjustment in the City's typical design <br />standards are made. The proposed design required Public Service approval to fill adjacent <br />to their existing power lines. Also, easements for drainage on properties west of McCaslin <br />Blvd. are required. There would need to be a compromise on the median width, that <br />roadway was originally planned for a 20' median this would be narrowed to 16'. The <br />question becomes what kind of road, is it a gravel road or an asphalt road. Estimates <br />indicate to put the road east of the poles versus the right in/right out access concept would <br />cost approximately $5,000.00 more. Homart Development is building this road up front <br />and we are recovering through major thoroughfare fees. They have not objection to that <br />additional cost. The issue on gravel and asphalt is not just first cost but maintenance cost. <br />As a street maintainer, the Public Works Department would prefer to maintain an asphalt <br />street. <br />Howard: What is the benefits to the citizens of Louisville? <br />Phare: I don't know if there is any direct benefits to the City of <br /> Louisville. It is accommodating a request from our <br /> neighbors so to speak to the west. <br />Howard: Is there any detriment to the City? <br />Phare: I don't believe there is. <br /> 6 <br />