My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1991 10 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1991 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1991 10 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:33 PM
Creation date
6/16/2006 2:01:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
10/1/1991
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1991 10 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> -- . <br />Blankenship: Most, means to the best we were able to address them. <br /> Questions regarding cost of living. I believe we <br /> explained that adequately to employees how we factored <br /> it into the pay plan and how we set the community wage <br /> curve, etc. Concerns not addressing the pay package <br /> specifically because we addressed the entire benefit <br /> package. Concerns over various changes and how it <br /> would affect those individuals. Even after the series of <br /> meetings that we held last week we have had just about <br /> a steady steam of department heads and/or employees <br /> or combinations of both visiting to express concerns and <br /> to have these concerns addressed. Something as <br /> mundane as job titles and as major as "you've under <br /> valued my job." I would say in that context, yes, we <br /> have addressed most of the concerns. There may be <br /> one or two that I don't know about and have not <br /> addressed, but I believe we have given an ear to every <br /> concern and have addressed it. <br />Carnival: Could you elaborate a little bit on the term <br /> "compression" as it relates to the Police Department and <br /> how that affects the other employees? My <br /> understanding of that is that experience is not taken <br /> into consideration across the board. <br />Blankenship: We are driving an economic animal here. We have a <br /> Police Department which the City feels is a highly <br /> competent police force; highly trained; veteran officers <br /> that we wish to keep as veteran officers of this City. <br /> They are harder to replace than another rank and file <br /> employee in another department. That is an economic <br /> fact of life. We can go out and recruit for want of a <br /> better job title, secretaries and have a hundred and fifty, <br /> two-hundred applications tomorrow. Whereas, we <br /> couldn't go out on the street and pluck a police officer <br /> and say you're a police officer tomorrow. We would <br /> have to go through an extensive background evaluation <br /> period; training period before that individual could be <br /> certified as street ready. That is the context in which <br /> we are addressing the compression factor. Officers we <br /> hired earlier this year, would be at the same pay grade <br /> level as an officer who has been on the force for two <br /> years/two and a half years, the inequity of that situation. <br /> That is the compression factor we are talking about. <br /> 11 <br /> -. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.