Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> --" <br />pay issue. At the time this compensatory back pay issue was under review it was decided <br />that if there were people who had since left the City of Louisville's employment and who <br />came to request a claim that it would be reviewed in the same manner that current <br />employees claims had been reviewed. Pam Ferris Droesch has met with Bill Blankenship <br />in regard to her claim for compensatory time pay. The only complication in this one is that <br />part of her duties were Administrative Assistant and part City Clerk and at the time she <br />was not required to separate them. It is her feeling that she is entitled to the overtime for <br />those hours that she spent. She had been given comp-time or paid hour for hour. The <br />amount of money that is involved here is the other one-half hour for those hours that she <br />is addressing. If you do this, we will need to consider Donna Cummings who did not <br />request time for the time she spent as City Clerk. We would have to come back and <br />address that for her. <br />Davidson: It seems to me that you and Bill have determined that <br /> overtime pay would not be appropriate since she was <br /> City Clerk. If the City staff has already determined <br /> that, why is the Council considering it again? <br />Brand: We made that determination on the assumption that the <br /> situation would be as it is now. Whereas, the City Clerk <br /> position would not be paid overtime because it is an <br /> exempt position under FLSA rules and also under the <br /> conditions now where people request their overtime in <br /> advance and state the reason and state the time they <br /> worked it. At the time this was prepared I was of that <br /> opinion because it was very clear cut to me, but she was <br /> working under a different set of assumptions. She was <br /> working under the assumption that the duties were <br /> inter-related and that comp-time or overtime was <br /> available for both. <br />Davidson: I understand what she thinks, but the way I understand <br /> what you guys interpreted it was because she was City <br /> Clerk. It was in fact an exempt position. Is it still the <br /> belief of staff that this was an exempt position? I don't <br /> know how you would be able to distinguish one from <br /> the other, other than saying the person was City Clerk <br /> and that was an exempt position. <br />Brand: Bill's memo to me and my conclusion, based on his <br /> memo, was based on the way the situation is set-up now. <br /> Which is the City Clerk's duties are clearly separated <br /> from the Administrative Assistant's duties. We had <br /> those duties separated with Linda doing about eighty- <br /> 16 <br />