My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1991 10 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1991 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1991 10 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:33 PM
Creation date
6/16/2006 2:01:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
10/1/1991
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1991 10 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> ...1 <br /> percent of them and Donna doing about twenty-percent <br /> of them before and Donna co-mingled that with her <br /> secretaries time. She would take planning minutes home <br /> and do those at home and not charge. Donna did not <br /> charge for the City Clerk time. Donna was working <br /> under the current rules with that understanding. Pam <br /> says that wasn't the understanding when she was here. <br /> I don't feel it is something that I can make a judgement <br /> on because I wasn't here at that time. <br />Sackett: Randy and Herm might have to help me out and I want <br /> to ask Annette the question based on the way I <br /> understood things were. We've had difficulty finding <br /> someone to be the City Clerk because it doesn't pay <br /> enough. So we thought at the time that, well, Pam is <br /> Terry Hundley's secretary she can assume those <br /> responsibilities and the dollars were in my mind <br /> irrelevant. If she was going to do more work and I kind <br /> of thought we would take the two hundred dollars and <br /> contribute it toward offsetting her expenses. I generally <br /> thought she was getting paid for the number of hours <br /> she worked. The separation between City Clerk and <br /> City Administrator's secretary was not even defined. If <br /> that is the case would your position on her request <br /> change? At the time I didn't know whether she was <br /> getting paid overtime or whatever. I assumed if she was <br /> a non-exempt employee she would have gotten overtime <br /> and if she was an exempt employee in her executive <br /> secretary work that she wouldn't have gotten overtime. <br /> I'm thinking it is one job and if you determine it is <br /> exempt then I'm saying lets not pay her and if you think <br /> it is legally non-exempt as one job then I'd probably say <br /> maybe we shouldn't. <br />Blankenship: Legally it is neither. The position is not subject to the <br /> provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act as an elected <br /> position, even though an individual is appointed to it. <br />Sackett: What I'm saying is that I don't think Pam had the <br /> choice to be City Clerk, I think we just said you're the <br /> executive secretary and we need a City Clerk, you're it. <br /> I don't know what Terry told her because I didn't get <br /> involved in that. I think he said that was part of your <br /> job. When we don't have a City Clerk you will fill that <br /> 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.