My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1991 10 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1991 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1991 10 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:33 PM
Creation date
6/16/2006 2:01:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
10/1/1991
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1991 10 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> .. . <br />Davidson: Then is it your opinion we should pay her for these <br /> hours? I guess that is what I am trying to figure out. I <br /> don't really know. You guys have looked into it in a lot <br /> of detail. I think if you think we should pay her then we <br /> should pay her. <br />Carnival: Annette, the position you are taking is based on the <br /> current policy, no, she would not be paid. <br />Brand: Based on the current policy, no, she would not be paid. <br />Carnival: But based on what has happened in the past and based <br /> on the fact that we did choose to pay those people that <br /> were exempt and then were compensated I think the <br /> fair thing to do in this case would be to also compensate <br /> Pam for that extra half hour. You've compensated her <br /> for the hour like everyone else and everyone else other <br /> than Pam at this point, with the exception of Donna, if <br /> she would come in and protest her hours, has been paid <br /> the extra half hour. The key words in my perception is <br /> now and then. What is fair and what we should do <br /> starting from this point on. <br />Brand: I have no questions about now. It was a different set of <br /> circumstances under which she worked then. <br />Howard: I need my memory jogged because I don't remember, <br /> was Ms. Ferris-Doersch working as the City Clerk after <br /> she stopped working in her Executive Secretary position <br /> or did she quit both at the same time? <br />Fauson: She quit both at the same time. <br />Hornbostel: I don't remember that. I remember for a couple of <br /> months she stopped her Executive Secretary position <br /> and then she resigned as City Clerk. <br />Howard: What I am getting to, is trying to understand what she <br /> thought the separation was or if there was one. I guess <br /> it is difficult for me because on one hand some of her <br /> actions were that these were two separate jobs. She was <br /> obviously able to quit one and keep on with the other <br /> and if nothing had happened she could have kept on <br /> with the other one until the next election. I don't know, <br /> 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.