Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ..., <br /> specific vested rights per state statutes it is part of the <br /> process. The property owner asks for annexation for <br /> services and zoning to do specific types of land <br /> development down the line. The very next step would <br /> be final plat and planning and development but the <br /> land use is already established by virtue of the zoning. <br /> If you wish to go in that direction it could be construed <br /> as leading up to development as a commercial parcel, <br /> which is at this point in time is not consistent with the <br /> IGA that is in force. You could annex and zone for <br /> commercial and then proceed to try to get unanimous <br /> consent for an amendment or take other remedies or <br /> actions. In annexing and zoning you will be heading in <br /> that direction. Whether or not it would end up with the <br /> IGA amended or not, that window is 1995. I'm not sure <br /> of Mr. and Mrs. Neumann's plans for development, but <br /> I believe it is earlier than that. I offer that as your <br /> options. <br />Howard: Did the two entities express any reason why they were <br /> against the request? <br />Franklin: They were fairly specific. In the case of the City of <br /> Lafayette they noted that the area wasn't overlapped <br /> with their comprehensive planning area and they also <br /> noted that they had amended their comprehensive <br /> planning area in 1990 to reflect the open space <br /> designation called out by the Northwest Parkway <br /> Agreement. I construe that means they would support <br /> and have supported, by policy, the open space for <br /> acquisition designation and would not approve another <br /> jurisdictions attempt to make it commercial. In the case <br /> of Boulder County, they were a little more detailed in <br /> terms of the procedures of the IGA and their concern <br /> about premature development. They had asked us to <br /> consider the 1995 review date and to see if at that time <br /> the Northwest Parkway is a reality and make some <br /> decisions and look again at the annexation request. <br />Sackett: Isn't there a portion of the Neumann's property that is <br /> not covered by the open space specifically to the west of <br /> Hwy. 42? <br />Franklin: Their property is located just west of Ishmel property <br /> 5 <br /> -- <br />