My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2010 05 17 APPROVED
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2010 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2010 05 17 APPROVED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:24 PM
Creation date
7/19/2010 10:41:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCMIN 2010 05 17 APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 17, 2010 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br />asking if there should be different plaques for commercial and residential <br />buildings. <br /> <br />Members of the commission agreed one plaque works for both types of buildings. <br /> <br />Muth also stated McCartney wanted to know if a picture of the historic building <br />should be included on the plaque. <br /> <br />Members stated if it could be fit on the plaque and is not exorbitantly expensive, <br />they would like to include the picture. <br /> <br />Koertje asked bids be done in time for the June meeting. <br /> <br />Update/Discussion/Action – Preservation Awards <br /> <br />Koertje asked if the Commission wanted to pursue the awards for 2010 again. <br /> <br />Members agreed to do the awards in 2010. <br /> <br />Muckle asked if they could get copies of pictures of the runners-up from 2009 <br />including 1948 photos. <br /> <br />Muth said she would send the information out to everyone. <br /> <br />Muckle stated she would be happy to take photos of any additional buildings <br />members want to discuss at the June meeting. She will also go to the Carnegie <br />Library to get the 1948 photos. Members need to have their suggestions to <br />Muckle by June 1. <br /> <br />Update/Discussion/Action – Historic Preservation Fund <br /> <br />Koertje noted McCartney included a budget spreadsheet in the meeting packet. <br />He asked staff for some clarification on what it means. <br /> <br />Muth noted the “Revised Budget” Column is due to the 2010 budget cuts made in <br />March but none of those affected the HPF. She added the budgeted numbers are <br />not the same as the actual numbers of what has been spent. <br /> <br />Stewart asked if there was a way to get actual amounts spent year-to-date, not <br />just budgeted amounts. <br /> <br />Muth will ask McCartney to provide this information at the June meeting. <br /> <br />Update/Discussion/Action – Louisville Preservation Master Plan <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.