My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2009 06 15 APPROVED
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2009 06 15 APPROVED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:23 PM
Creation date
7/19/2010 10:42:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCMIN 2009 06 15 APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 15, 2009 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br /> <br />Stewart stated that the grant can be re-applied for in 6 months. <br /> <br />Muckle asked if we should have someone to review the grant application to see <br />why it might have been denied? <br /> <br />Lewis agreed that the Commission should have someone review it so the grant <br />request can be resurrected. <br /> <br />Williams asked if anyone knew how often a grant can be reapplied for and when <br />the next deadline is. <br /> <br />st <br />Stewart answered that the next deadline is September 1. <br /> <br />Koertje stated that the alternative is to do this on our own without the SHF. <br /> <br />Tofte stated that the surveys need to be redone because there are several <br />mistakes. Tofte stated she would be interested in having an outside source <br />assist with the grant application to ensure it is filled out properly. She also <br />requested to see a copy of the grant application. <br /> <br />Koertje stated he will make copies of the grant application available to the <br />Commissioners. <br /> <br />Muckle stated it would be good for the Commissioners to have copies of the <br />survey. She also stated the social historys of each structure should be on the <br />City’s website. <br /> <br />Lewis stated there should be a special website just for the HPC. <br /> <br />Muckle stated the public should be seeing all that we are seeing. Muckle then <br />inquired about the status of the GIS system. <br /> <br />McCartney answered there is a GIS Coordinator on staff and development of GIS <br />is moving forward. <br /> <br />Muckle inquired if the Commission received a grant for the 2000 Survey. <br /> <br />Tofte stated she thought there was a grant. <br /> <br />Koertje redirected the discussion back to the fund. He stated that the acquisition <br />element was a big deal but the Commission might not be ready for that element. <br /> <br />Muckle wondered if the City could consider the old hospital (on Jefferson) as a <br />potential acquisition. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.